up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126037632021

Appellant / Complainant

Strescon Industries Limited

VS

Respondent

Pratham Buildon Private Limited, Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Dakshya Infra Developers Private Limited

Developer Firm

strescon industries limited

Disputed Amount

30,00,000

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional Misrepresentation

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

24 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126037632021 by Strescon Industries Limited against Pratham Buildon Private Limited, Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Dakshya Infra Developers Private Limited before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional Misrepresentation
2
Stage 130/05/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed Respondents 2 and 3 to refund the appellant's deposited amount for Flat Nos. M-913 and M-914 with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit.

3
Stage 224/02/2023

Hearing

The appellant is challenging a Regulatory Authority order that directed possession of a unit instead of the requested refund, citing a breach of the Builder Buyer Agreement's possession timeline. The tribunal has heard arguments from both parties and reserved judgment.

4
Stage 324/01/2023

Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 404/01/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension for the parties to attempt an amicable settlement, noting that the case must proceed to a final hearing on 24.01.2023 without further adjournments.

6
Stage 502/12/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment upon the joint request of counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 04.01.2023.

7
Stage 603/11/2022

Hearing

No text available.

8
Stage 729/09/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal allowed an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and directed both parties to exchange and submit lists of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments before the next hearing on 03.11.2022.

9
Stage 830/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the respondent's counsel's absence and imposed a cost of Rs. 500/- to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund for showing disinterest.

10
Stage 901/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for August 30, 2022.

11
Stage 1013/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and parties are attempting an amicable settlement; consequently, the matter is adjourned to 01.08.2022.

12
Stage 1106/07/2022

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request to club Appeal-609/2021 with Appeal No. 612/2021 for a joint final hearing scheduled for 13.07.2022.

13
Stage 1218/05/2022

to file objections and its reply

The Tribunal updated the counsel of record for the appellant from Shri Saghar Mehdi to Shri Harish Pandey and directed the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections within 10 days.

14
Stage 1327/04/2022

to file objections and its reply

The Tribunal noted a clerical error regarding incorrect annexures filed by the respondent; the respondent agreed to provide corrected documents within one week, and the matter is scheduled for hearing on 18.05.2022.

15
Stage 1416/03/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant and rescheduled the hearing for April 27, 2022.

16
Stage 1503/02/2022

Hearing

No text available.

17
Stage 1610/01/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondents a final opportunity to file a reply against the grounds of appeal within two weeks and scheduled the matter for further orders on February 3, 2022.

18
Stage 1706/12/2021

Final Hearing

No text available.

19
Stage 1812/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange objections and replies via email and instructed them to upload their pleadings on the e-portal before the next hearing scheduled for 06.12.2021.

20
Stage 1923/09/2021

Hearing on Recall App

The Tribunal issued notices to the respondents and permitted the appellant's counsel to serve notice via email due to technical errors on the e-portal, scheduling the next hearing for 12.11.2021.

21
Stage 20Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126037632021-30-05-2023

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed Respondents 2 and 3 to refund the appellant's deposited amount for Flat Nos. M-913 and M-914 with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit.

22
Stage 21Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126037632021-24-02-2023

The appellant is challenging a Regulatory Authority order that directed possession of a unit instead of the requested refund, citing a breach of the Builder Buyer Agreement's possession timeline. The tribunal has heard arguments from both parties and reserved judgment.

23
Stage 22Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126037632021-30-08-2022

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the respondent's counsel's absence and imposed a cost of Rs. 500/- to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund for showing disinterest.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed Respondents 2 and 3 to refund the appellant's deposited amount for Flat Nos. M-913 and M-914 with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1% per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed Respondents 2 and 3 to refund the appellant's deposited amount for Flat Nos. M-913 and M-914 with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1% per annum

Interest Period

from the date of deposit till the refund of the amount

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 12

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Harish Pandey

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Siddharth Nandwani
  • Abhishek Shukla

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126037632021-30-05-2023

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed Respondents 2 and 3 to refund the appellant's deposited amount for Flat Nos. M-913 and M-914 with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126037632021-24-02-2023

The appellant is challenging a Regulatory Authority order that directed possession of a unit instead of the requested refund, citing a breach of the Builder Buyer Agreement's possession timeline. The tribunal has heard arguments from both parties and reserved judgment.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126037632021-30-08-2022

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the respondent's counsel's absence and imposed a cost of Rs. 500/- to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund for showing disinterest.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for strescon industries limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →