Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Prem Chand Gupta, Kanak Jaiswal
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126037382021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Prem Chand Gupta, Kanak Jaiswal before up_rera.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority due to the appellant's failure to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the appellant's non-compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and granted an opportunity for the applicant to deposit the remaining amount before the next hearing on 22.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the appellant's intent to deposit the remaining amount required under Section 43(5) of the Act after recalculation and adjourned the matter to 29.07.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the applicant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 23.05.2022.
Delay condonation
This text appears to be a header or a fragment of a court order from the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow, containing only case identification details and names of the presiding members without any substantive rulings.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal noted the dispute regarding the respondent's refusal to accept an alternate flat in 'Sargam' apartment and clarified that the deposit amount required under Section 43(5) depends on the formal offer of possession for either the original or alternate unit.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal directed the Registry to submit a report regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and scheduled the case for further orders on January 3, 2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126037382021-22-09-2022
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority due to the appellant's failure to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act.
Tribunal Order #0901126037382021-03-01-2022
The Tribunal noted the dispute regarding the respondent's refusal to accept an alternate flat in 'Sargam' apartment and clarified that the deposit amount required under Section 43(5) depends on the formal offer of possession for either the original or alternate unit.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority due to the appellant's failure to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority due to the appellant's failure to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Haridaya Narain Tiwari
- Ankit Kumar Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority due to the appellant's failure to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act.
The Tribunal noted the dispute regarding the respondent's refusal to accept an alternate flat in 'Sargam' apartment and clarified that the deposit amount required under Section 43(5) depends on the formal offer of possession for either the original or alternate unit.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.