Appellant / Complainant
U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad
Respondent
Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Adjudicating Officer, Dhirendra Kumar Bhandari
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126037262023 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Adjudicating Officer, Dhirendra Kumar Bhandari before up_rera.
Hearing
Following a remand from the High Court, the Tribunal directed the Registry to verify the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding a deposit of Rs. 4,70,692/-.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act and scheduled the case for orders on April 3, 2026.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession as a form of compensation under Section 18.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the admissibility of respondent objections and the jurisdiction over interest for delayed possession, but has reserved its judgment.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections and adjourned the matter, along with similar appeals, to 16.05.2024 for orders or hearing.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to respondent no. 1 for filing objections and directed respondent no. 3 to file their vakalatnama and objections within a week, with the matter listed for hearing on 10.05.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal treated the service of notice on the respondents as sufficient based on postal and online records and granted 10 days for all parties to file objections.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an appeal filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad challenging an Adjudicating Officer's order, and scheduled the matter for further orders on 19.03.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126037262023-12-06-2024
The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession as a form of compensation under Section 18.
Tribunal Order #0901126037262023-30-04-2026
Following a remand from the High Court, the Tribunal directed the Registry to verify the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding a deposit of Rs. 4,70,692/-.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession as a form of compensation under Section 18. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession as a form of compensation under Section 18.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shobhit Mohan Shukla
- Azhar Ikram
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession as a form of compensation under Section 18.
Following a remand from the High Court, the Tribunal directed the Registry to verify the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding a deposit of Rs. 4,70,692/-.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.