up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126036422021

Appellant / Complainant

Subhash Chandra

VS

Respondent

Ansal Hi-Tech Townships Ltd.

Developer Firm

ansal hi-tech townships ltd.

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title Transfer

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

23 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126036422021 by Subhash Chandra against Ansal Hi-Tech Townships Ltd. before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title Transfer
2
Stage 104/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal modified the Regulatory Authority's order to correct a mistake, directing the respondent to provide an alternative plot of similar size instead of a unit in a tower, as the original agreement was for a plot.

3
Stage 224/05/2023

Hearing

No text available.

4
Stage 315/05/2023

Hearing

The matter was adjourned due to lack of time and is scheduled to be listed again on 24.05.2023.

5
Stage 402/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to reschedule the hearing, listing the appeal for orders on 15.05.2023.

6
Stage 521/03/2023

Hearing

No text available.

7
Stage 610/02/2023

Hearing

No text available.

8
Stage 706/01/2023

Hearing

No text available.

9
Stage 806/12/2022

Hearing

No text available.

10
Stage 911/11/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged between the parties and adjourned the matter to 06.12.2022 for hearing.

11
Stage 1011/10/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the filing of a replication/rejoinder by the appellant and adjourned the appeal to 11.11.2022 for hearing.

12
Stage 1107/09/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for 11.10.2022.

13
Stage 1205/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for September 7, 2022.

14
Stage 1331/05/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply within 20 days and scheduled the next hearing for August 5, 2022.

15
Stage 1425/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent an extension of 20 days to file a reply against the grounds of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for May 31, 2022.

16
Stage 1515/03/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and serve it to the appellant's counsel via email before the next hearing on 25.04.2022.

17
Stage 1610/01/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 02.02.2022.

18
Stage 1717/12/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the parties to upload their pleadings on the e-portal and file originals with the Registry before the next hearing date, which is scheduled for 10.01.2022.

19
Stage 1822/11/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file its Vakalatnama along with a reply to the grounds of appeal and provide copies to the appellant before the next hearing on 17.12.2021.

20
Stage 1925/10/2021

Notice

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their Vakalat Nama and a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing date.

21
Stage 2014/09/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal noted that the appeal is within time and directed the issuance of notice to the respondent via registered post and email, scheduling the matter for further orders on 25.10.2021.

22
Stage 21Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126036422021-04-08-2023

The Tribunal modified the Regulatory Authority's order to correct a mistake, directing the respondent to provide an alternative plot of similar size instead of a unit in a tower, as the original agreement was for a plot.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal modified the Regulatory Authority's order to correct a mistake, directing the respondent to provide an alternative plot of similar size instead of a unit in a tower, as the original agreement was for a plot. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% p.a..

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1% p.a.Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal modified the Regulatory Authority's order to correct a mistake, directing the respondent to provide an alternative plot of similar size instead of a unit in a tower, as the original agreement was for a plot.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1% p.a.

Interest Period

from the promised period till receipt of OC/CC or offer of possession, whichever is later

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Prashant Kumar
  • Fuhar Gupta

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Misra

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126036422021-04-08-2023

The Tribunal modified the Regulatory Authority's order to correct a mistake, directing the respondent to provide an alternative plot of similar size instead of a unit in a tower, as the original agreement was for a plot.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for ansal hi-tech townships ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →