Appellant / Complainant
Deepak Pandey
Respondent
Vasu Infrastructure Private Limited, Anthem Yash Kirti Infracity Private Limited
vasu infrastructure private limited
₹9,19,819
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126036392021 by Deepak Pandey against Vasu Infrastructure Private Limited, Anthem Yash Kirti Infracity Private Limited before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order that the respondent no. 1 is entitled to demand the balance amount due to a dishonored cheque and may execute the sale deed only after receiving the remaining consideration.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both the appellant and respondent, and the judgment has been reserved.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulty and directed the respondent to upload their objections and additional documents into the respondent's folder within one week.
Hearing
The respondent's counsel requested and was granted a one-week extension to ensure compliance with the previous order dated 08.08.2022, with the matter rescheduled for 19.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel additional time to file instructions as previously sought and scheduled the matter for further orders on 21.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel one week to seek instructions and adjourned the appeal to 31.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and the appeal is ready for hearing; consequently, the matter is scheduled for a hearing on 08.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to file short written arguments on the e-portal at least seven days before the next hearing and exchange them via email. The case is scheduled for hearing on 21.07.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay is covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request for an adjournment and scheduled the case for 21.04.2022 to hear the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for March 28, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the defective appeal to 19.01.2022 for the disposal of a limitation application and any related objections.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed beyond the limitation period and ordered notice to be issued to the respondent via registered post and e-mail, with the matter listed for 23.12.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126036392021-30-05-2023
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order that the respondent no. 1 is entitled to demand the balance amount due to a dishonored cheque and may execute the sale deed only after receiving the remaining consideration.
Tribunal Order #0901126036392021-21-04-2022
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay is covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order that the respondent no. 1 is entitled to demand the balance amount due to a dishonored cheque and may execute the sale deed only after receiving the remaining consideration. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order that the respondent no. 1 is entitled to demand the balance amount due to a dishonored cheque and may execute the sale deed only after receiving the remaining consideration.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Sushil Kumar Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Himanshu Hemant Gupta
- Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order that the respondent no. 1 is entitled to demand the balance amount due to a dishonored cheque and may execute the sale deed only after receiving the remaining consideration.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay is covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for vasu infrastructure private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.