Appellant / Complainant
Vinay Mishra
Respondent
M/S Saviour Builders Pvt Ltd
saviour builders pvt ltd
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126036072021 by Vinay Mishra against M/S Saviour Builders Pvt Ltd before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint non-maintainable in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in M/s Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections regarding the application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for 28.04.2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and directed both parties to file their respective objections and replies within specified timelines before the next hearing on 20.04.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to correct a filing error regarding their Vakalatnama and granted two weeks for filing objections to the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 31.01.2022 for the disposal of a limitation application and its objections due to the absence of the respondent.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted defects regarding the appeal's filing for limitation and directed that notice be issued to the respondent via registered post and email, with the matter listed for 07.01.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126036072021-28-04-2022
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint non-maintainable in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in M/s Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint non-maintainable in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in M/s Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint non-maintainable in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in M/s Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Rajesh Kumar Misra
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Azhar Ikram
- Manish Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint non-maintainable in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in M/s Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Need to research all rulings for saviour builders pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.