Appellant / Complainant
Neetu Singh, Iconic Infrastate Pvt. Ltd., Iconic Infraestate Private Limited
Respondent
Conic Infraestate Private Limited
iconic infrastate pvt. ltd.
₹21,27,600
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126035182021 by Neetu Singh, Iconic Infrastate Pvt. Ltd., Iconic Infraestate Private Limited against Conic Infraestate Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Regulatory Authority's decision, ruling that because the appellant had obtained a conveyance deed for the plot, they no longer qualified as an 'allottee' under the Act for the purpose of claiming possession of the Villa.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to reschedule the hearing of Appeal-577/2021 to 03.04.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal ordered that the appeal shall proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to file objections, and scheduled the next hearing for 10.03.2025.
Hearing
The Respondent was granted a 10-day extension to file objections, with the appeal scheduled for hearing on January 13, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and directed both parties to exchange pleadings before the next hearing on December 6, 2024.
Further Order
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the applicant.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the absence of both parties and rescheduled the hearing for 18.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent and directed that a 'Dasti' notice be issued to them, with the matter scheduled for further orders on 07.07.2022.
Hearing
This text is a formal heading/caption for an appeal before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal involving Neetu Singh versus Conic Infraestate Private Limited; no substantive ruling or directive is contained in this excerpt.
Hearing
The Tribunal issued a fresh notice to the respondent due to refusal of service and directed the parties to exchange pleadings regarding the application for condonation of delay via email before the next hearing on 12.01.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent via registered post and email due to their non-appearance and scheduled the case for orders on 25.11.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and scheduled the matter for 05.10.2021 to address the disposal of a limitation application.
Tribunal Order #0901126035182021-03-04-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Regulatory Authority's decision, ruling that because the appellant had obtained a conveyance deed for the plot, they no longer qualified as an 'allottee' under the Act for the purpose of claiming possession of the Villa.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Regulatory Authority's decision, ruling that because the appellant had obtained a conveyance deed for the plot, they no longer qualified as an 'allottee' under the Act for the purpose of claiming possession of the Villa. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Regulatory Authority's decision, ruling that because the appellant had obtained a conveyance deed for the plot, they no longer qualified as an 'allottee' under the Act for the purpose of claiming possession of the Villa.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ajit Shukla
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
- Krishna Kumar Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Regulatory Authority's decision, ruling that because the appellant had obtained a conveyance deed for the plot, they no longer qualified as an 'allottee' under the Act for the purpose of claiming possession of the Villa.
Need to research all rulings for iconic infrastate pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.