Appellant / Complainant
Patel Advance Jv
Respondent
Veena Sharma, Ram Kishan Sharma
patel advance jv
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126033942024 by Patel Advance Jv against Veena Sharma, Ram Kishan Sharma before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 61-day delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file a rejoinder and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 14.05.2025, noting that no further opportunities for filing the rejoinder will be provided.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file a rejoinder and directed the exchange of pleadings, scheduling the next hearing for April 25, 2025.
Delay condonation
The appellant's counsel filed an application for adjournment, and the tribunal has rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 02.04.2025.
Delay condonation
The appeal has been adjourned at the request of the respondent's counsel and is scheduled for the next hearing on 06.03.2025, with directions for the parties to exchange pleadings.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 17.02.2025 and directed the respondent to file any objections in the interim.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural requirements for service of notice and filing of objections regarding the application for condonation of delay and the memo of appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126033942024-14-05-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 61-day delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 61-day delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 61-day delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Rohit Jaiswal
- Jayant Gupta
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Puneet Sahai Bisaria
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 61-day delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay.
Need to research all rulings for patel advance jv?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.