Appellant / Complainant
Anshul Agrawal
Respondent
Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.
uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.
₹51,93,514
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126033732021 by Anshul Agrawal against Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had dismissed the appellant's complaint, ruling that the project was an 'ongoing project' requiring registration because the partial completion certificate did not constitute full development completion. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision based on these observations.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding whether a project with a partial completion certificate must be registered as an ongoing project under the Act; judgment has been reserved.
Part Heard
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties and scheduled the appeal for the delivery of judgment on December 30, 2022.
Part Heard
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the respondent and scheduled the matter for further orders on 23.12.2022.
Part Heard
The Tribunal adjourned the matter from 19.10.2022 to 11.11.2022 for the delivery of judgment due to the unavailability of dictation sources.
Further Order
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the maintainability of the appeal and reserved the judgment for delivery on 19.10.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's application regarding the maintainability of the appeal and scheduled the matter for hearing on 13.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the respondent's counsel due to illness and travel constraints, rescheduling the hearing for August 11, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange and file written arguments via email at least seven days prior to the next hearing, which is scheduled for 22.07.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the respondent's counsel due to a scheduling conflict and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 12.05.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for 27.04.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 04.02.2022 because the respondent's counsel was unable to attend due to illness.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and directed both parties to upload their pleadings on the e-portal before the next hearing on 10.01.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal directed the issuance of notice to the respondent via registered post and e-mail and scheduled the matter for further orders on 25.11.2021.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed the appellant's counsel to take necessary steps within a week, while also noting a request for bench transfer.
Tribunal Order #0901126033732021-27-04-2023
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding whether a project with a partial completion certificate must be registered as an ongoing project under the Act; judgment has been reserved.
Tribunal Order #0901126033732021-31-05-2023
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had dismissed the appellant's complaint, ruling that the project was an 'ongoing project' requiring registration because the partial completion certificate did not constitute full development completion. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision based on these observations.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had dismissed the appellant's complaint, ruling that the project was an 'ongoing project' requiring registration because the partial completion certificate did not constitute full development completion. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision based on these observations. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: 10% p.a..
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had dismissed the appellant's complaint, ruling that the project was an 'ongoing project' requiring registration because the partial completion certificate did not constitute full development completion. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision based on these observations.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
10% p.a.
Interest Period
from 01.09.2005 to 10.01.2011
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
- Aahuti Agarwal
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Bal Kishor Verma
- Amit Yadav
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding whether a project with a partial completion certificate must be registered as an ongoing project under the Act; judgment has been reserved.
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had dismissed the appellant's complaint, ruling that the project was an 'ongoing project' requiring registration because the partial completion certificate did not constitute full development completion. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision based on these observations.
Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.