up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126033532022

Appellant / Complainant

Omaxe India Trade Centre Private Limited

VS

Respondent

Pradeep

Developer Firm

omaxe india trade centre private limited

Disputed Amount

27,58,964

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

21 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126033532022 by Omaxe India Trade Centre Private Limited against Pradeep before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 116/08/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to grant interest as compensation for delay in possession, and directed the appellant to apply for the release of their pre-deposit.

3
Stage 208/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted interim relief by restraining the Regulatory Authority and Recovery Officer from executing recovery orders against the appellant to prevent double jeopardy, as the appellant has already deposited Rs 10,54,502/- before the Tribunal pending final judgment.

4
Stage 331/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 08.08.2023 to consider the appellant's application for interim relief regarding a recovery certificate issued despite a prior deposit made under Section 43(5) of the Act.

5
Stage 418/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a conflict with a High Court engagement and rescheduled the hearing for July 31, 2023.

6
Stage 508/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 18.05.2023 along with similar matters.

7
Stage 611/04/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to medical reasons and rescheduled the hearing for 08.05.2023.

8
Stage 727/02/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 11.04.2023.

9
Stage 825/01/2023

Hearing

No text available.

10
Stage 903/01/2023

For Order

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and, upon joint request from both counsels, scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 25.01.2022.

11
Stage 1002/12/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the respondent to upload their objections to the e-portal and granted the appellant one week to file a reply and serve it to the respondent.

12
Stage 1124/11/2022

Delay condonation

No text available.

13
Stage 1207/11/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed both parties to exchange copies via email and upload them to the e-portal. It also instructed the respondent's counsel to register their names on the Tribunal's e-portal.

14
Stage 1328/09/2022

Delay condonation

This text appears to be the header/caption of a court order from the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dated 28.09.2022, containing party names and presiding members, but does not include any substantive rulings or directives.

15
Stage 1402/09/2022

Notice

The Tribunal verified that the appeal was filed within the limitation period and confirmed compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act via a deposit of Rs.10,85,470/-, directing the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

16
Stage 1504/08/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed the Registry to verify compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding the applicant's deposit of Rs. 10,85,470/-.

17
Stage 16Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126033532022-16-08-2023

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to grant interest as compensation for delay in possession, and directed the appellant to apply for the release of their pre-deposit.

18
Stage 17Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126033532022-08-08-2023

The Tribunal granted interim relief by restraining the Regulatory Authority and Recovery Officer from executing recovery orders against the appellant to prevent double jeopardy, as the appellant has already deposited Rs 10,54,502/- before the Tribunal pending final judgment.

19
Stage 18Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126033532022-02-09-2022

The Tribunal verified that the appeal was filed within the limitation period and confirmed compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act via a deposit of Rs.10,85,470/-, directing the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

20
Stage 19Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126033532022-31-07-2023

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 08.08.2023 to consider the appellant's application for interim relief regarding a recovery certificate issued despite a prior deposit made under Section 43(5) of the Act.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to grant interest as compensation for delay in possession, and directed the appellant to apply for the release of their pre-deposit. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+ 1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+ 1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to grant interest as compensation for delay in possession, and directed the appellant to apply for the release of their pre-deposit.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+ 1%

Interest Period

from 01.05.2017 till the date of issuance of possession letter (excluding force majeure period from 25.03.2020 to 25.09.2020)

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Vineet K Singh Bisen

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Amit Kumar Srivastava
  • Amit Srivastava

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126033532022-16-08-2023

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to grant interest as compensation for delay in possession, and directed the appellant to apply for the release of their pre-deposit.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126033532022-08-08-2023

The Tribunal granted interim relief by restraining the Regulatory Authority and Recovery Officer from executing recovery orders against the appellant to prevent double jeopardy, as the appellant has already deposited Rs 10,54,502/- before the Tribunal pending final judgment.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126033532022-02-09-2022

The Tribunal verified that the appeal was filed within the limitation period and confirmed compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act via a deposit of Rs.10,85,470/-, directing the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126033532022-31-07-2023

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 08.08.2023 to consider the appellant's application for interim relief regarding a recovery certificate issued despite a prior deposit made under Section 43(5) of the Act.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for omaxe india trade centre private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →