Appellant / Complainant
Ramprastha Urban Development Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Nirupama Pandey
ramprastha urban development pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126033222025 by Ramprastha Urban Development Pvt. Ltd. against Nirupama Pandey before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 639-day delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding the delay lacked sufficient cause and was not bona fide.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder to the objections regarding the delay condonation application and scheduled the matter for hearing on 28.11.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections regarding a delay condonation application and scheduled the next hearing for 11.11.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and allowed the appellant to file a rejoinder within one week thereafter, scheduling the case for orders on 17.10.2025.
Tribunal Order #0901126033222025-28-11-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 639-day delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding the delay lacked sufficient cause and was not bona fide.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 639-day delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding the delay lacked sufficient cause and was not bona fide. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 639-day delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding the delay lacked sufficient cause and was not bona fide.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Anupam Mishra
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 639-day delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding the delay lacked sufficient cause and was not bona fide.
Need to research all rulings for ramprastha urban development pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.