Appellant / Complainant
Pradeep Singh
Respondent
Grih Vatika Homes Pvt. Ltd.
grih vatika homes pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126032352021 by Pradeep Singh against Grih Vatika Homes Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Further Order
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the Regulatory Authority's rejection of a complaint, ruling that because the respondent's project was not registered under the RERA Act 2016, the complaint and subsequent appeal were not maintainable.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel three days to research the maintainability of an appeal against an unregistered project and scheduled the matter for further orders on 02.03.2022.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for a short adjournment to submit supporting documents and rescheduled the matter for 13.01.2022.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal observed that despite due service of notice, the respondent failed to appear; consequently, the case was ordered to proceed ex-parte against the respondent.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties despite service of notice and adjourned the matter to 22.11.2021 for further orders.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal noted that registry defects have been removed and directed the issuance of notice to the respondent via registered post and email, with the matter listed for further orders on 27.09.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126032352021-02-03-2022
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the Regulatory Authority's rejection of a complaint, ruling that because the respondent's project was not registered under the RERA Act 2016, the complaint and subsequent appeal were not maintainable.
Tribunal Order #0901126032352021-22-11-2021
The Tribunal observed that despite due service of notice, the respondent failed to appear; consequently, the case was ordered to proceed ex-parte against the respondent.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the Regulatory Authority's rejection of a complaint, ruling that because the respondent's project was not registered under the RERA Act 2016, the complaint and subsequent appeal were not maintainable. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the Regulatory Authority's rejection of a complaint, ruling that because the respondent's project was not registered under the RERA Act 2016, the complaint and subsequent appeal were not maintainable.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Surendra Kumar Mishra
Respondent Advocate(s)
- | Counsel for Appellant | |
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the Regulatory Authority's rejection of a complaint, ruling that because the respondent's project was not registered under the RERA Act 2016, the complaint and subsequent appeal were not maintainable.
The Tribunal observed that despite due service of notice, the respondent failed to appear; consequently, the case was ordered to proceed ex-parte against the respondent.
Need to research all rulings for grih vatika homes pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.