Appellant / Complainant
Air Force Naval Housing Board
Respondent
Vinod Kumar Sharma
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126032132021 by Air Force Naval Housing Board against Vinod Kumar Sharma before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal dismissed 48 appeals filed by Air Force Naval Housing Board, upholding the RERA order for interest at MCLR+1% due to project delays and directing the transfer of pre-deposited funds to U.P. RERA for disbursement to allottees.
Hearing
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 21/2023 regarding the matter.
For Order
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D 866/2021 for the relevant directions.
For Order
The Tribunal has ordered the matter to be listed for hearing on February 13, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for consideration of an application for condonation of delay and a subsequent hearing on 12.07.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the prayer clause, confining the challenge specifically to the Regulatory Authority's direction regarding interest for delayed possession.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for December 14, 2022, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for October 13, 2022.
Defect Removal
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016.
Tribunal Order #0901126032132021-07-05-2024
The Tribunal dismissed 48 appeals filed by Air Force Naval Housing Board, upholding the RERA order for interest at MCLR+1% due to project delays and directing the transfer of pre-deposited funds to U.P. RERA for disbursement to allottees.
Tribunal Order #0901126032132021-14-12-2022
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the prayer clause, confining the challenge specifically to the Regulatory Authority's direction regarding interest for delayed possession.
Tribunal Order #0901126032132021-15-12-2021
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed 48 appeals filed by Air Force Naval Housing Board, upholding the RERA order for interest at MCLR+1% due to project delays and directing the transfer of pre-deposited funds to U.P. RERA for disbursement to allottees. The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1% per annum.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed 48 appeals filed by Air Force Naval Housing Board, upholding the RERA order for interest at MCLR+1% due to project delays and directing the transfer of pre-deposited funds to U.P. RERA for disbursement to allottees. The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1% per annum
Interest Period
from 01.07.2012 till offer of possession or obtaining of OC whichever is later
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Harsh Vardhan
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Ramakant
- Pushpendra Kumar
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal dismissed 48 appeals filed by Air Force Naval Housing Board, upholding the RERA order for interest at MCLR+1% due to project delays and directing the transfer of pre-deposited funds to U.P. RERA for disbursement to allottees.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the prayer clause, confining the challenge specifically to the Regulatory Authority's direction regarding interest for delayed possession.
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.