up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126031942024

Appellant / Complainant

Alok Pratap Singh

VS

Respondent

Sanchar Nest Sahakari Awas Samiti Ltd, U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Developer Firm

sanchar nest sahakari awas samiti ltd

Disputed Amount

33,47,625

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestUnfair Cancellation & Forfeiture

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

25 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126031942024 by Alok Pratap Singh against Sanchar Nest Sahakari Awas Samiti Ltd, U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestUnfair Cancellation & Forfeiture
2
Stage 125/03/2026

Further Hearing

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA order and ruled that the cancellation of the appellant's unit was unlawful due to project delays and procedural failures, directing the respondent to refund the balance deposit and pay interest on all amounts previously refunded.

3
Stage 218/03/2026

Further Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 25.03.2026 for further hearing and directed the submission of dates and events along with other relevant documents.

4
Stage 312/02/2026

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to upload a CA certificate regarding interest calculations and scheduled the case for orders on 18.03.2026.

5
Stage 421/01/2026

Further Hearing

The Tribunal directed the parties to file a list of dates and events along with CA-certified computations regarding the interest claim on a deposit of Rs. 29,45,125/-, and scheduled the matter for orders on 12.02.2026.

6
Stage 507/01/2026

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 21.01.2026.

7
Stage 601/12/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from both parties and rescheduled the case for orders on January 7, 2026.

8
Stage 719/11/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal noted the respondent's request for an adjournment and, despite opposition from the appellant, scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 01.12.2025.

9
Stage 830/10/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the respondent and directed the respondent to make an endeavor to satisfy the interest component in the interim.

10
Stage 924/09/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent promoter's request for time to seek instructions and adjourned the matter to 30.10.2025 for orders or hearing.

11
Stage 1019/08/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 24.09.2025.

12
Stage 1115/07/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of the parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to be listed for orders or hearing on 19.08.2025.

13
Stage 1212/05/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal noted the respondent's inability to appear due to illness and granted permission for the appellant to file a rejoinder affidavit regarding the objection to the amendment application, adjourning the matter to 15.07.2025.

14
Stage 1317/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appellant's amendment application and directed the appellant to file a rejoinder within one week thereafter, with the next hearing scheduled for 12.05.2025.

15
Stage 1417/03/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 17.04.2025 and directed the appellant to file an amendment application, while also ordering a correction to the respondent's counsel's name in the registry.

16
Stage 1519/02/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file a vakalatnama and scheduled the case for orders on March 17, 2025.

17
Stage 1627/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment due to the respondent's counsel's inability to appear and rescheduled the final hearing for 19.02.2025.

18
Stage 1717/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the appellant has filed a rejoinder to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 27.01.2025.

19
Stage 1810/12/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the next hearing for 17.01.2024, directing the appellant to file a rejoinder affidavit in the interim.

20
Stage 1908/11/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent a 10-day extension to file objections to the memo of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for December 10, 2024.

21
Stage 2030/09/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent three weeks to file objections and directed the appellant to reply within one week thereafter, scheduling the next hearing for November 8, 2024.

22
Stage 2130/08/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and Vakalatnama, with subsequent timelines set for the appellant's reply and the next hearing scheduled for 30.09.2024.

23
Stage 22Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126031942024-25-03-2026

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA order and ruled that the cancellation of the appellant's unit was unlawful due to project delays and procedural failures, directing the respondent to refund the balance deposit and pay interest on all amounts previously refunded.

24
Stage 23Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126031942024-30-10-2025

The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the respondent and directed the respondent to make an endeavor to satisfy the interest component in the interim.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA order and ruled that the cancellation of the appellant's unit was unlawful due to project delays and procedural failures, directing the respondent to refund the balance deposit and pay interest on all amounts previously refunded. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR + 1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA order and ruled that the cancellation of the appellant's unit was unlawful due to project delays and procedural failures, directing the respondent to refund the balance deposit and pay interest on all amounts previously refunded.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR + 1%

Interest Period

till the date of payment

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(5)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Misra
  • Krishna Kumar Singh
  • Gautam Johri

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Harprit Singh Arora
  • Vijay Gupta

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126031942024-25-03-2026

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA order and ruled that the cancellation of the appellant's unit was unlawful due to project delays and procedural failures, directing the respondent to refund the balance deposit and pay interest on all amounts previously refunded.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126031942024-30-10-2025

The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the respondent and directed the respondent to make an endeavor to satisfy the interest component in the interim.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for sanchar nest sahakari awas samiti ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →