up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126031632023

Appellant / Complainant

Homekraft Infra Private Limited

VS

Respondent

Ashima Jain

Developer Firm

homekraft infra private limited

Disputed Amount

4,06,179

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Refund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestUnfair Cancellation & Forfeiture

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

27 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126031632023 by Homekraft Infra Private Limited against Ashima Jain before up_rera.

Refund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestUnfair Cancellation & Forfeiture
2
Stage 121/01/2026

Further Hearing

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing the restoration of a unit on humanitarian grounds, ruling instead that the appellant promoter must pay interest amounting to Rs. 4,06,179/- to the respondent for the period between cancellation and refund.

3
Stage 207/01/2026

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 21.01.2026.

4
Stage 301/12/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment and scheduled the case for orders on January 7, 2026.

5
Stage 419/11/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 01.12.2025.

6
Stage 530/10/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for orders to 19.11.2025.

7
Stage 624/09/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 30.10.2025 at the request of the appellant's counsel and directed the appellant to upload necessary documents in the interim.

8
Stage 719/08/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks to bring the demand notice dated 19.08.2020 and the project's QPR on record, adjourning the matter to 24.09.2025.

9
Stage 815/07/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the appellant's challenge to a Regulatory Authority order and granted the respondent additional time to address the matter, adjourning the case to 19.08.2025.

10
Stage 912/05/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to a new hearing date of 15.07.2025 at the request of the learned counsel for the parties.

11
Stage 1017/04/2025

Further Hearing

The provided text appears to be a header or caption for an appeal (APPEAL-34/2024) involving Homekraft Infra Private Limited before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, but it contains no substantive directives or rulings.

12
Stage 1120/03/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 17.04.2025 following a joint request from the parties and directed the appellant to file a rejoinder affidavit to the respondent's supplementary objections.

13
Stage 1219/02/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal noted the withdrawal of the respondent's counsel, granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder, and scheduled the next hearing for March 20, 2025.

14
Stage 1329/01/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 19.02.2025 following a joint request from the learned counsel for both parties.

15
Stage 1408/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a CA certificate calculating interest on the refunded amount at the rate of MCLR+2% due to the delay in payment to the respondent.

16
Stage 1521/11/2024

Hearing

The proceedings were adjourned at the request of the respondent's counsel, and the matter is scheduled for a hearing on 08.01.2025.

17
Stage 1617/10/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to list the appeal for orders on 21.11.2024.

18
Stage 1706/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a 7-day extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 17.10.2024.

19
Stage 1805/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a rejoinder affidavit against the respondent's objections and directed the service of a soft copy via email, scheduling the next hearing for September 6, 2024.

20
Stage 1905/07/2024

Hearing

No text available.

21
Stage 2015/03/2024

Defect Removal

The appeal filed by Homekraft Infra Private Limited was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

22
Stage 2113/02/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal ruled that the appellant is not required to deposit any amount under Section 43(5) of the Act and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

23
Stage 22Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126031632023-21-01-2026

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing the restoration of a unit on humanitarian grounds, ruling instead that the appellant promoter must pay interest amounting to Rs. 4,06,179/- to the respondent for the period between cancellation and refund.

24
Stage 23Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126031632023-15-03-2024

The appeal filed by Homekraft Infra Private Limited was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

25
Stage 24Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126031632023-13-02-2024

The Tribunal ruled that the appellant is not required to deposit any amount under Section 43(5) of the Act and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

26
Stage 25Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126031632023-08-01-2025

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a CA certificate calculating interest on the refunded amount at the rate of MCLR+2% due to the delay in payment to the respondent.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing the restoration of a unit on humanitarian grounds, ruling instead that the appellant promoter must pay interest amounting to Rs. 4,06,179/- to the respondent for the period between cancellation and refund. The appeal filed by Homekraft Infra Private Limited was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 2 percent.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR + 2 percentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing the restoration of a unit on humanitarian grounds, ruling instead that the appellant promoter must pay interest amounting to Rs. 4,06,179/- to the respondent for the period between cancellation and refund. The appeal filed by Homekraft Infra Private Limited was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR + 2 percent

Interest Period

from 05.02.2021 to 15.09.2023

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(5)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Suchita Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Vijay Gupta
  • Abhishek Shukla
  • N A

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126031632023-21-01-2026

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing the restoration of a unit on humanitarian grounds, ruling instead that the appellant promoter must pay interest amounting to Rs. 4,06,179/- to the respondent for the period between cancellation and refund.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126031632023-15-03-2024

The appeal filed by Homekraft Infra Private Limited was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126031632023-13-02-2024

The Tribunal ruled that the appellant is not required to deposit any amount under Section 43(5) of the Act and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126031632023-08-01-2025

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a CA certificate calculating interest on the refunded amount at the rate of MCLR+2% due to the delay in payment to the respondent.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for homekraft infra private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →