Appellant / Complainant
Ankur Kumar Manchanda
Respondent
Uppal Chadda Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd
uppal chadda hi-tech developers pvt. ltd
₹1,20,00,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126031422024 by Ankur Kumar Manchanda against Uppal Chadda Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Appellate Tribunal rejected the Review Petition filed by Ankur Manchanda, upholding its previous decision that the appellant ceased to be an 'allottee' following the transfer of the property and finding no error apparent on the face of the record.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both counsel regarding the review petition and subsequently reserved its judgment.
Hearing
The proceedings were adjourned following an application by the respondent's counsel, with the matter rescheduled for consideration on 22.01.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment, rescheduling the case to 16.12.2024 and allowing the appellant to upload a rejoinder in the interim.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter to 14.11.2024 and directed the respondent to file any objections in the interim.
For Order
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the review petition due to the applicant's medical grounds and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the review petition and directed the applicant to file a reply within one week after receiving the soft copy of said objections.
Tribunal Order #0901126031422024-27-03-2025
The Appellate Tribunal rejected the Review Petition filed by Ankur Manchanda, upholding its previous decision that the appellant ceased to be an 'allottee' following the transfer of the property and finding no error apparent on the face of the record.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal rejected the Review Petition filed by Ankur Manchanda, upholding its previous decision that the appellant ceased to be an 'allottee' following the transfer of the property and finding no error apparent on the face of the record. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal rejected the Review Petition filed by Ankur Manchanda, upholding its previous decision that the appellant ceased to be an 'allottee' following the transfer of the property and finding no error apparent on the face of the record.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Appellate Tribunal rejected the Review Petition filed by Ankur Manchanda, upholding its previous decision that the appellant ceased to be an 'allottee' following the transfer of the property and finding no error apparent on the face of the record.
Need to research all rulings for uppal chadda hi-tech developers pvt. ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.