Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Geetanjali Mishra
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126031392022 by Lucknow Development Authority against Geetanjali Mishra before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the appellant/promoter is mandatorily obligated to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum to the respondent for the period from 05.10.2012 to 18.02.2019 (excluding a specific period of farmer agitation).
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment on behalf of the appellant and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 11.02.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the disengagement of its panel lawyers and failure to appear.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the case is ripe for hearing and scheduled it for orders/hearing on 21.04.2023 following a request for adjournment by the respondent's counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the applicant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for a fresh hearing on March 16, 2023, following the departure of the previous presiding officer.
Further Order
The court heard arguments from both the appellant and respondent and subsequently reserved the judgment for further delivery.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the Respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the defective appeal for further orders on 22.11.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed the applicant to serve the appeal documents via speed-post and email, scheduling the matter for 31.10.2022 to address the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the respondent's absence despite service of notice and directed the appellant to file an affidavit of service, adjourning the defective appeal to 23.09.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted three days to file a certified copy of the impugned order and issued notice to the respondent, returnable on 29.07.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126031392022-11-02-2025
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the appellant/promoter is mandatorily obligated to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum to the respondent for the period from 05.10.2012 to 18.02.2019 (excluding a specific period of farmer agitation).
Tribunal Order #0901126031392022-21-04-2023
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the disengagement of its panel lawyers and failure to appear.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the appellant/promoter is mandatorily obligated to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum to the respondent for the period from 05.10.2012 to 18.02.2019 (excluding a specific period of farmer agitation). The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the disengagement of its panel lawyers and failure to appear. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the appellant/promoter is mandatorily obligated to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum to the respondent for the period from 05.10.2012 to 18.02.2019 (excluding a specific period of farmer agitation). The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the disengagement of its panel lawyers and failure to appear.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1% per annum
Interest Period
from 05.10.2012 to 18.02.2019 (excluding period from 27.04.2013 to 26.10.2016)
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Samarth Saxena
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the appellant/promoter is mandatorily obligated to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum to the respondent for the period from 05.10.2012 to 18.02.2019 (excluding a specific period of farmer agitation).
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the disengagement of its panel lawyers and failure to appear.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.