Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Krishna Chandra Pandey
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126031372021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Krishna Chandra Pandey before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed that Appeal-602/2021 be clubbed and heard together with the respondent's cross-appeal (No. 214/2020) on the scheduled date of 11.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his absence from the station and rescheduled the hearing for 22.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal ordered that Appeal-602/2021 be listed alongside cross appeal No. 214/2023 for hearing or orders on 06.11.2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was wrongly listed for today's date, as it had already been directed to be listed on 25.05.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant, Lucknow Development Authority, to allow counsel time to file a Vakalatnama and examine the case records, scheduling the next hearing for May 25, 2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application requested by the counsel for the respondent and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 06.12.2022, to be heard alongside Cross Appeal No. 214/2020.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on November 17, 2022.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal granted an application for adjournment moved by the counsel for the appellant, Lucknow Development Authority.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for an adjournment due to the senior counsel's unavailability and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 28.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange and submit a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments, scheduling the next hearing for August 30, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange lists of dates, events, and cited cases at least seven days prior to the next hearing, which is scheduled for August 2, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for May 25, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the application for substitution of heirs due to the respondent's death and condoned a 470-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court guidelines regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, and ordered the case to be registered as a Regular Appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 10.02.2022 for the disposal of a limitation application and its corresponding objection following an adjournment request by the applicant's counsel.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request to list the matter on 10.01.2022 to allow the appellant to file an additional application for the substitution of the respondent's daughter.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the death of the respondent and directed the appellant to identify and substitute the legal heirs of the deceased. The matter is listed for further orders on 13.12.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to substitute the legal heirs of the deceased respondent, if information is obtained, and adjourned the matter to 18.11.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange objections and replies via email and e-portal before the next hearing on 26.10.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126031372021-25-03-2022
The Tribunal allowed the application for substitution of heirs due to the respondent's death and condoned a 470-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court guidelines regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, and ordered the case to be registered as a Regular Appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126031372021-11-03-2024
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
Respondent Advocate(s)
- S.C. Srivastava
- Manoj Kumar Srivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal allowed the application for substitution of heirs due to the respondent's death and condoned a 470-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court guidelines regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, and ordered the case to be registered as a Regular Appeal.
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.