Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Anup Nigam, Shilpi Nigam
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126031292021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Anup Nigam, Shilpi Nigam before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal rejected the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority across multiple cases and directed that funds deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged between the parties and reserved the judgment for further consideration.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for September 1, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the filing of a replication by the appellant and a list of dates/events by both parties, subsequently listing the matter for final hearing on 03.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for May 27, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a replication to the reply within 15 days and serve it via email, subsequently listing the case for hearing on 25.04.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the Supreme Court's orders regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file their Vakalatnama and objections to the limitation application, scheduling the matter for January 11, 2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126031292021-17-11-2022
The Tribunal rejected the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority across multiple cases and directed that funds deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal.
Tribunal Order #0901126031292021-21-02-2022
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the Supreme Court's orders regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority across multiple cases and directed that funds deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority across multiple cases and directed that funds deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Hridesh Srivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal rejected the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority across multiple cases and directed that funds deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the Supreme Court's orders regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.