Appellant / Complainant
Omaxe Be Together Lucknow Busport Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority
omaxe be together lucknow busport pvt. ltd.
Appellant
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126030932025 by Omaxe Be Together Lucknow Busport Pvt. Ltd. against Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal set aside and quashed the U.P. RERA order dated 09.04.2025 and Form 'D' on the grounds that the original order was non-speaking, directing the Regulatory Authority to reconsider the project registration application within 30 days.
Hearing
The Tribunal observed that the Regulatory Authority failed to consider the appellant's reply on merit and granted the appellant one week to address whether the underlying agreement is a lease or a license and its registration requirements.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned a 79-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the matter involves public interest and a PPP model project, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the Respondent, U.P. RERA, two weeks to file objections to the delay condonation application and the memo of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 07.10.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent seven days to file objections and scheduled the matter for orders on 23.09.2025.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal disposed of the appellant's waiver application, ruling that no deposit is required under Section 43(5) because the registration was rejected and a stop-order (Form-D) was issued. The Tribunal further issued notice to the respondent and scheduled the matter for hearing on 17.09.2025.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal has granted a request from the appellant's counsel to list the appeal for orders or hearing on September 4, 2025.
Tribunal Order #0901126030932025-10-11-2025
The Tribunal set aside and quashed the U.P. RERA order dated 09.04.2025 and Form 'D' on the grounds that the original order was non-speaking, directing the Regulatory Authority to reconsider the project registration application within 30 days.
Tribunal Order #0901126030932025-04-11-2025
The Tribunal observed that the Regulatory Authority failed to consider the appellant's reply on merit and granted the appellant one week to address whether the underlying agreement is a lease or a license and its registration requirements.
Tribunal Order #0901126030932025-07-10-2025
The Tribunal condoned a 79-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the matter involves public interest and a PPP model project, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126030932025-04-09-2025
The Tribunal disposed of the appellant's waiver application, ruling that no deposit is required under Section 43(5) because the registration was rejected and a stop-order (Form-D) was issued. The Tribunal further issued notice to the respondent and scheduled the matter for hearing on 17.09.2025.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside and quashed the U.P. RERA order dated 09.04.2025 and Form 'D' on the grounds that the original order was non-speaking, directing the Regulatory Authority to reconsider the project registration application within 30 days. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside and quashed the U.P. RERA order dated 09.04.2025 and Form 'D' on the grounds that the original order was non-speaking, directing the Regulatory Authority to reconsider the project registration application within 30 days.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
- N A
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shireesh Kumar
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal set aside and quashed the U.P. RERA order dated 09.04.2025 and Form 'D' on the grounds that the original order was non-speaking, directing the Regulatory Authority to reconsider the project registration application within 30 days.
The Tribunal observed that the Regulatory Authority failed to consider the appellant's reply on merit and granted the appellant one week to address whether the underlying agreement is a lease or a license and its registration requirements.
The Tribunal condoned a 79-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the matter involves public interest and a PPP model project, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal disposed of the appellant's waiver application, ruling that no deposit is required under Section 43(5) because the registration was rejected and a stop-order (Form-D) was issued. The Tribunal further issued notice to the respondent and scheduled the matter for hearing on 17.09.2025.
Need to research all rulings for omaxe be together lucknow busport pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.