up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126030922024

Appellant / Complainant

Shivendra Nath Dwivedi, Payal Dwivedi

VS

Respondent

Lucknow Development Authority

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

14 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126030922024 by Shivendra Nath Dwivedi, Payal Dwivedi against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to complaints filed under the RERA Act 2016 and held that promoters cannot evade their statutory obligation to pay delay interest by citing laches or the execution of a conveyance deed. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders rejecting complaints on limitation grounds and restored the appeals for decision on merits.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from various counsels representing the appellant and respondents, and subsequently reserved the judgment for further delivery.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Further Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 411/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the ongoing arguments in Appeal-472/2024 and scheduled the matter for further hearing on April 21, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.

6
Stage 509/04/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the appeal to be listed on 11.04.2025 at 10:30 a.m.

7
Stage 608/04/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal refers the parties to a previously passed order dated 08.04.2025 in a related appeal (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) for the directions in this matter.

8
Stage 727/03/2025

Admission

Upon the joint request of both parties, the matter has been adjourned and rescheduled for hearing on April 8, 2025, at 1:30 PM.

9
Stage 826/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal has scheduled the case for orders or hearing on 27.03.2025 before Court No. 1.

10
Stage 903/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and allowed a subsequent week for the appellant to file a rejoinder, scheduling the next hearing for March 26, 2025.

11
Stage 1006/02/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and permitted the appellant to file a rejoinder within one week of receiving said objections.

12
Stage 1103/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural steps for service of notice and the exchange of objections and replies, scheduling the next hearing for February 6, 2025.

13
Stage 12Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126030922024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to complaints filed under the RERA Act 2016 and held that promoters cannot evade their statutory obligation to pay delay interest by citing laches or the execution of a conveyance deed. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders rejecting complaints on limitation grounds and restored the appeals for decision on merits.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to complaints filed under the RERA Act 2016 and held that promoters cannot evade their statutory obligation to pay delay interest by citing laches or the execution of a conveyance deed. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders rejecting complaints on limitation grounds and restored the appeals for decision on merits. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to complaints filed under the RERA Act 2016 and held that promoters cannot evade their statutory obligation to pay delay interest by citing laches or the execution of a conveyance deed. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders rejecting complaints on limitation grounds and restored the appeals for decision on merits.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Atul Tripathi

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Abhishek Khare

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126030922024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to complaints filed under the RERA Act 2016 and held that promoters cannot evade their statutory obligation to pay delay interest by citing laches or the execution of a conveyance deed. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders rejecting complaints on limitation grounds and restored the appeals for decision on merits.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →