Appellant / Complainant
Rashmi Sachan, Sujeet Kumar Sachan
Respondent
Lucknow Development Authority
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126030912024 by Rashmi Sachan, Sujeet Kumar Sachan against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from various counsels representing the appellant and respondents, and subsequently reserved the judgment for further delivery.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter, scheduling the appeal for further hearing on April 21, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.
Further Hearing
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to be listed on 11.04.2025 at 10:30 a.m.
Hearing
The Tribunal refers the matter to the orders passed in Appeal No. D 220/2024 (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) for directions.
Admission
Upon the joint request of both parties, the matter has been adjourned and rescheduled for hearing on April 8, 2025, at 1:30 PM.
Admission
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for orders or hearing on March 27, 2025, before Court No. 1.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections, with a provision for a rejoinder to be filed within one week thereafter, and scheduled the next hearing for March 26, 2025.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and permitted the appellant to file a rejoinder within one week of receiving said objections.
Admission
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and established a procedural timeline for service of the appeal and the filing of objections and replies.
Tribunal Order #0901126030912024-29-08-2025
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Atul Tripathi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.