Appellant / Complainant
Arun Prakash, Rajni Srivastava
Respondent
Lucknow Development Authority
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126030902024 by Arun Prakash, Rajni Srivastava against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from various counsels representing the appellant and respondents, and subsequently reserved the judgment for delivery.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter, scheduling the appeal for further hearing on April 21, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.
Further Hearing
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for a new hearing on 11.04.2025 at 10:30 a.m.
For Order
The Tribunal issued a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 220/2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections, with the appellant permitted to file a reply within one week thereafter, and scheduled the next hearing for 17.04.2025.
For Order
The court noted the appellant's counsel's inability to attend due to illness and directed the appellant to file an affidavit of service before the next hearing, which is scheduled for 14.02.2025.
Admission
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent, Lucknow Development Authority, and outlined the procedural timeline for service of notice, filing of objections, and subsequent replies before the next hearing on 21.01.2025.
Tribunal Order #0901126030902024-29-08-2025
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Atul Tripathi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.