up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126030882024

Appellant / Complainant

Archana Verma, Ashok Kumar Verma

VS

Respondent

Lucknow Development Authority

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

15 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126030882024 by Archana Verma, Ashok Kumar Verma against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations under Section 18(1) by citing delay or the execution of a conveyance deed.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has heard the arguments from the counsels for the appellant and respondents and has reserved the judgment for further delivery.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Further Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 411/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the ongoing arguments in Appeal-447/2024 and scheduled the matter for further hearing on April 21, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.

6
Stage 509/04/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the appeal has been adjourned and rescheduled for hearing on 11.04.2025 at 10.30 a.m.

7
Stage 608/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal refers the matter to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 220/2024 (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) for orders.

8
Stage 727/03/2025

Further Hearing

The matter has been adjourned to 08.04.2025 at 1:30 PM following a joint request from both the appellant and the respondent.

9
Stage 820/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal heard arguments from the appellant's counsel and amicus curiae, subsequently adjourning the appeal for further hearing on March 27, 2025.

10
Stage 910/03/2025

For Order

Upon the request of the counsel for the appellant, the tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 20.03.2025.

11
Stage 1007/02/2025

For Order

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has adjourned the appeal following a request from the respondent's counsel and scheduled the next hearing for March 10, 2025.

12
Stage 1116/01/2025

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to adjourn the appeal to 07.02.2025 and directed that any objections be filed in the interim.

13
Stage 1216/12/2024

Admission

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the notice and appeal documents via speed-post and email, scheduling the next hearing for January 16, 2025.

14
Stage 13Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126030882024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations under Section 18(1) by citing delay or the execution of a conveyance deed.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations under Section 18(1) by citing delay or the execution of a conveyance deed. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations under Section 18(1) by citing delay or the execution of a conveyance deed.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Atul Tripathi

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Abhishek Khare

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126030882024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations under Section 18(1) by citing delay or the execution of a conveyance deed.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →