up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126030762022

Appellant / Complainant

Pradyot Kumar Singhal

VS

Respondent

Pancham Realcon Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

pancham realcon pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

3,93,347

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Refund of InvestmentUnfair Cancellation & Forfeiture

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

28 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126030762022 by Pradyot Kumar Singhal against Pancham Realcon Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

Refund of InvestmentUnfair Cancellation & Forfeiture
2
Stage 109/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the allottee, upholding the RERA order that permitted the promoter to deduct 10% of the deposit as earnest money following the cancellation of the allotment due to the appellant's default in payment.

3
Stage 205/12/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal condoned a 2-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal, scheduling the hearing for January 9, 2025.

4
Stage 305/11/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for December 5, 2024.

5
Stage 425/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and directed the appellant to upload a better affidavit within three days, allowing the respondent seven days to file a reply thereafter.

6
Stage 527/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a better affidavit and serve it electronically, directing the respondent to file objections within a subsequent week, and scheduled the matter for 25.09.2024.

7
Stage 629/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to file a better affidavit for condonation of delay and directed the respondent to reply via email within one week thereafter. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 27.08.2024.

8
Stage 730/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has listed a defective appeal for the consideration of an application for condonation of delay and subsequent hearing on 29.07.2024.

9
Stage 829/04/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

10
Stage 922/03/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a one-week extension for the filing of an improved affidavit regarding the application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on 29.04.2024.

11
Stage 1020/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 22.03.2024.

12
Stage 1111/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted the appearance of new counsel for the applicant and scheduled the matter for February 20, 2024, to consider the application for condonation of delay and proceed with the hearing.

13
Stage 1206/10/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

14
Stage 1328/08/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

15
Stage 1410/07/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

16
Stage 1528/04/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 10.07.2023 for consideration of the application for condonation of delay and further hearing, following a joint request from both parties.

17
Stage 1620/03/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

18
Stage 1714/02/2023

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant due to illness and provided a 10-day extension for filing a reply against the respondent's objections, rescheduling the hearing to 20.03.2023.

19
Stage 1812/01/2023

Exchange of pleadings

No text available.

20
Stage 1914/12/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for further orders on 12.01.2023.

21
Stage 2017/11/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal granted the applicant permission to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 14.12.2022.

22
Stage 2120/10/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the defective appeal for further orders on 17.11.2022.

23
Stage 2216/09/2022

Notice

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 20.10.2022.

24
Stage 2322/08/2022

Notice

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent and rescheduled the hearing for September 16, 2022.

25
Stage 2405/08/2022

Notice

The Tribunal adjourned the case on 05.08.2022 to allow the applicant's counsel to rectify a defective appeal.

26
Stage 2506/06/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal directed the applicant to rectify registry defects within a week and outlined specific procedural requirements for serving notice of the delay condonation application to the respondent before the next hearing on 05.08.2022.

27
Stage 26Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126030762022-09-01-2025

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the allottee, upholding the RERA order that permitted the promoter to deduct 10% of the deposit as earnest money following the cancellation of the allotment due to the appellant's default in payment.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the allottee, upholding the RERA order that permitted the promoter to deduct 10% of the deposit as earnest money following the cancellation of the allotment due to the appellant's default in payment. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the allottee, upholding the RERA order that permitted the promoter to deduct 10% of the deposit as earnest money following the cancellation of the allotment due to the appellant's default in payment.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(5)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Azhar Ikram
  • Piyush Verma
  • Manish Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • V. K. S. Bisen

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126030762022-09-01-2025

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the allottee, upholding the RERA order that permitted the promoter to deduct 10% of the deposit as earnest money following the cancellation of the allotment due to the appellant's default in payment.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for pancham realcon pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →