up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126030032024

Appellant / Complainant

Bikram Singh

VS

Respondent

Logix City Developers Pvt. Ltd., Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Developer Firm

logix city developers pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & Execution

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

23 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126030032024 by Bikram Singh against Logix City Developers Pvt. Ltd., Real Estate Regulatory Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & Execution
2
Stage 113/11/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing a refund, ruling that since the appellant sought possession and not withdrawal, the Authority cannot unilaterally impose a refund option in violation of Section 18(1) of the Act. The Authority is directed to execute the original decree for the possession of the unit expeditiously.

3
Stage 229/10/2025

Hearing

The court granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 13.11.2025.

4
Stage 326/09/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal directed that the appeal shall proceed ex-parte against the respondent, Logix City Developers Pvt. Ltd., if they fail to appear or file objections by the next hearing date on 29.10.2025.

5
Stage 412/09/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 26.09.2025.

6
Stage 501/09/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment made by the appellant and rescheduled the hearing for September 12, 2025.

7
Stage 614/08/2025

Hearing

The appellant's counsel requested an adjournment, and the Tribunal has rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 01.09.2025.

8
Stage 728/07/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 14.08.2025.

9
Stage 803/07/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to condone a 779-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was not willful and was partly due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

10
Stage 905/05/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment made by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for orders on 03.07.2025.

11
Stage 1009/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 05.05.2025 and noted that the case will proceed ex parte against the respondent if they fail to appear on the scheduled date.

12
Stage 1112/03/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 09.04.2025.

13
Stage 1217/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to reschedule the appeal hearing to 12.03.2023.

14
Stage 1324/01/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for a hearing on 17.02.2025.

15
Stage 1416/01/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and scheduled the appeal for orders on 24.01.2025.

16
Stage 1506/12/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted sufficient service of notice on the respondent and directed them to file objections to the condonation of delay application and the memo of appeal within 10 days.

17
Stage 1605/11/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the case for orders on 06.12.2024.

18
Stage 1725/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appeal and application for condonation of delay, directing the appellant to serve the respondent and scheduling the matter for hearing on 05.11.2024.

19
Stage 1809/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 25.09.2024.

20
Stage 19Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126030032024-26-09-2025

The Tribunal directed that the appeal shall proceed ex-parte against the respondent, Logix City Developers Pvt. Ltd., if they fail to appear or file objections by the next hearing date on 29.10.2025.

21
Stage 20Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126030032024-03-07-2025

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to condone a 779-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was not willful and was partly due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

22
Stage 21Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126030032024-13-11-2025

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing a refund, ruling that since the appellant sought possession and not withdrawal, the Authority cannot unilaterally impose a refund option in violation of Section 18(1) of the Act. The Authority is directed to execute the original decree for the possession of the unit expeditiously.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing a refund, ruling that since the appellant sought possession and not withdrawal, the Authority cannot unilaterally impose a refund option in violation of Section 18(1) of the Act. The Authority is directed to execute the original decree for the possession of the unit expeditiously. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing a refund, ruling that since the appellant sought possession and not withdrawal, the Authority cannot unilaterally impose a refund option in violation of Section 18(1) of the Act. The Authority is directed to execute the original decree for the possession of the unit expeditiously.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

with effect from 20.06.2021

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 40Section 63Section 64

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Samrat Vaish

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126030032024-26-09-2025

The Tribunal directed that the appeal shall proceed ex-parte against the respondent, Logix City Developers Pvt. Ltd., if they fail to appear or file objections by the next hearing date on 29.10.2025.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126030032024-03-07-2025

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to condone a 779-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was not willful and was partly due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126030032024-13-11-2025

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing a refund, ruling that since the appellant sought possession and not withdrawal, the Authority cannot unilaterally impose a refund option in violation of Section 18(1) of the Act. The Authority is directed to execute the original decree for the possession of the unit expeditiously.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for logix city developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →