up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126029732024

Appellant / Complainant

Vishal Singh

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

17 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126029732024 by Vishal Singh against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal condoned a 7-day delay in filing the appeal and reserved judgment following oral arguments from the parties.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Further Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 411/04/2025

Delay condonation

The court has adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on April 21, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.

6
Stage 509/04/2025

Delay condonation

The court has adjourned the appeal to 11.04.2025 at 10:30 a.m. following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.

7
Stage 608/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued a procedural order directing the parties to refer to the order passed in a related case, Appeal No. D 220/2024 (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad).

8
Stage 727/03/2025

Delay condonation

Upon the joint request of both parties, the matter has been adjourned and rescheduled for hearing on April 8, 2025, at 1:30 PM.

9
Stage 825/03/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 27.03.2025 for orders, following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.

10
Stage 928/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant's counsel due to sickness and scheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay on 25.03.2025.

11
Stage 1005/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections and scheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay on 28.02.2025.

12
Stage 1109/01/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 05.02.2025.

13
Stage 1203/12/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for orders on 09.01.2025.

14
Stage 1325/10/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the appeal within three weeks, with a subsequent deadline for the appellant to file a reply.

15
Stage 1418/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appeal and application for condonation of delay, scheduling the matter for hearing on 25.10.2024.

16
Stage 15Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126029732024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • V.K Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • N N Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126029732024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →