up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126029602024

Appellant / Complainant

Annupama Singh

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

20 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126029602024 by Annupama Singh against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal condoned a seven-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal; judgment on the main appeal has been reserved.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Further Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 411/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has adjourned the ongoing arguments in Appeal-296/2024 and scheduled the matter for further hearing on April 21, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.

6
Stage 509/04/2025

Delay condonation

Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the appeal has been adjourned and rescheduled for hearing on 11.04.2025 at 10:30 a.m.

7
Stage 608/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued a procedural order directing the parties to refer to the order passed in Appeal No. D 220/2024 (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) for the relevant orders.

8
Stage 727/03/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to April 8, 2025, at 1:30 PM following a joint request from both parties.

9
Stage 825/03/2025

Delay condonation

Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the matter has been adjourned and listed for orders on 27.03.2025.

10
Stage 928/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 25.03.2025.

11
Stage 1005/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel 10 days to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on February 28, 2025, regarding the application for condonation of delay.

12
Stage 1108/01/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent timeline for the appellant to reply.

13
Stage 1223/11/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant due to counsel being out of station and provided a final opportunity to rectify registry defects by the next hearing date.

14
Stage 1328/10/2024

Defect Removal

No text available.

15
Stage 1425/09/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted a request to list the defective appeal for orders on 28.10.2024 to align with connected matters and address document uploading issues.

16
Stage 1518/09/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal directed the appellant to remove existing procedural defects identified by the Registry within one week and scheduled the matter for orders on 25.09.2024.

17
Stage 1630/08/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to rectify procedural defects in the appeal and scheduled the matter for a hearing on 18.09.2024.

18
Stage 17Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126029602024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

19
Stage 18Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126029602024-23-04-2025

The Tribunal condoned a seven-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal; judgment on the main appeal has been reserved.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • V.K Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • N.N. Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126029602024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126029602024-23-04-2025

The Tribunal condoned a seven-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal; judgment on the main appeal has been reserved.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →