Appellant / Complainant
Ghanshyam Tripathi
Respondent
U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126029582024 by Ghanshyam Tripathi against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay regarding the appeal filed by Dr. Ghanshyam Tripathi and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal; however, the final judgment on the appeal itself has been reserved.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal noted that arguments are ongoing and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on April 21, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 11.04.2025 at 10:30 A.M. following a joint request from the counsels of both parties.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previously passed order in Appeal No. D 220/2024 (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) for orders.
Further Hearing
The matter has been adjourned to April 8, 2025, at 1:30 PM following a joint request from both parties.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal heard arguments from the appellant's counsel, amicus curiae, and the Regulatory Authority, and subsequently scheduled the appeal for further hearing on March 27, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay and a subsequent hearing on March 20, 2025, following a joint request from both parties' counsel.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and directed that any reply be filed within a week thereafter, scheduling the next hearing for February 7, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 20.01.2025 for orders or hearing, following a joint request from the learned counsel for both parties.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent additional time to file an objection to the delay condonation application and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on November 28, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment following a request from the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for orders on 11.11.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to file objections to the appeal and the application for condonation of delay, with subsequent timelines set for the appellant's reply and a hearing scheduled for 01.10.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent regarding the appeal and directed the appellant to serve the notice and documents to the respondent via speed-post and email.
Tribunal Order #0901126029582024-29-08-2025
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Tribunal Order #0901126029582024-23-04-2025
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay regarding the appeal filed by Dr. Ghanshyam Tripathi and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal; however, the final judgment on the appeal itself has been reserved.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Syed Mohammad Abid
- Prashant Chaurasia
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh
- Gautam Johri
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay regarding the appeal filed by Dr. Ghanshyam Tripathi and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal; however, the final judgment on the appeal itself has been reserved.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.