up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126029522021

Appellant / Complainant

Rajni Gupta

VS

Respondent

Supertech Township Project Ltd

Developer Firm

supertech township project ltd

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

21 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126029522021 by Rajni Gupta against Supertech Township Project Ltd before up_rera.

2
Stage 114/03/2023

Further Order

The appeal was dismissed as 'not pressed' following a mutual settlement reached between the appellant and the respondent.

3
Stage 203/02/2023

Further Order

No text available.

4
Stage 319/12/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant and scheduled the matter for further orders on 03.02.2023.

5
Stage 402/12/2022

Further Order

The matter was recorded as settled between the parties outside of the Tribunal.

6
Stage 502/11/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the appellant to appear at the next hearing, noting their repeated absence and warning that failure to attend may result in proceedings initiated under the Act.

7
Stage 627/09/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 02.11.2022.

8
Stage 729/08/2022

Further Order

No text available.

9
Stage 818/07/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant and rescheduled the hearing for August 29, 2022.

10
Stage 906/05/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file an amendment application for the memo of appeal within one week and scheduled the next hearing for 18.07.2022.

11
Stage 1030/03/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply against the grounds of appeal and scheduled the case for a hearing on 06.05.2022.

12
Stage 1108/03/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the parties to exchange replies and upload documents on the e-portal before the next hearing on 30.03.2022.

13
Stage 1204/01/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned a delay of 10 months and 5 days in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's COVID-19 relaxation guidelines, and directed the Registry to register the appeal.

14
Stage 1329/11/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for 04.01.2022 to decide on the limitation application and objections.

15
Stage 1411/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the Respondent's counsel due to his unavailability and directed both parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.

16
Stage 1508/10/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel for an additional opportunity to argue the limitation application and rescheduled the hearing for November 11, 2021.

17
Stage 1611/09/2021

For Order

The matter was adjourned because the respondent's counsel was unprepared and had not yet filed a Vakalat Nama; the case is listed for 08.10.2021.

18
Stage 1703/09/2021

Notice

The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file a physical copy of the Vakalatnama and an objection to the limitation application, while noting efforts for potential settlement via Lok Adalat.

19
Stage 1806/08/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed beyond the limitation period and issued notice to the respondent, scheduling a follow-up hearing for September 3, 2021.

20
Stage 19Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126029522021-04-01-2022

The Tribunal condoned a delay of 10 months and 5 days in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's COVID-19 relaxation guidelines, and directed the Registry to register the appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

Dismissed as not pressed Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

Dismissed as not pressed

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Swetank Sharma

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Abhishek Khare

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126029522021-04-01-2022

The Tribunal condoned a delay of 10 months and 5 days in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's COVID-19 relaxation guidelines, and directed the Registry to register the appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for supertech township project ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →