Appellant / Complainant
Vijay Laxmi Sharma
Respondent
Up Awas Vikas Parishad
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126028842021 by Vijay Laxmi Sharma against Up Awas Vikas Parishad before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings and rescheduled the hearing for 16.10.2023 due to a three-day strike called by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an online complaint previously submitted to the Regulatory Authority and rescheduled the hearing for September 6, 2023.
Hearing
The matter is adjourned to 04.05.2023 following an assurance from the respondent's counsel that the issue regarding Service Tax refund will be resolved within a week.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to explain why the Service Tax amount mentioned in the Property Manager's order dated 01.08.2019 has not yet been refunded to the appellant, despite the GST portion being returned.
Hearing
The Tribunal questioned the respondent's requirement for the appellant to approach the Head Office for a GST refund when the transaction was processed at the Moradabad branch, and directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions.
Rest Arg. on Merit
The court heard arguments from both parties and reserved the judgment for further consideration.
Rest Arg. on Merit
The court noted the respondent's intent to file applications regarding GST deposits and has adjourned the appeal to 04.08.2022.
Rest Arg. on Merit
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the respondent and scheduled the matter for hearing on 31.05.2022.
Rest Arg. on Merit
The appeal was adjourned due to the non-appearance of parties and has been rescheduled for a hearing on 15.04.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned a 52-day delay in filing the appeal due to COVID-19 pandemic relaxations and directed the Registry to register the case as a regular appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 16.12.2021 for a hearing specifically regarding the point of limitation, following the respondent's request to file objections to an affidavit.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant ten days to file a better affidavit for condonation of delay and directed subsequent timelines for filing responses and replies before the next hearing on 30.11.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the parties to file their pleadings on the e-portal and in the Registry, scheduling the next hearing for November 2, 2021, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued fresh notices to the respondent due to lack of service by the appellant and directed the parties to exchange pleadings via email and upload them to the e-portal before the next hearing on 01.10.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice on the application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange pleadings via email and upload them to the e-portal before the next hearing on 31.08.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126028842021-17-03-2023
The Tribunal questioned the respondent's requirement for the appellant to approach the Head Office for a GST refund when the transaction was processed at the Moradabad branch, and directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions.
Tribunal Order #0901126028842021-16-12-2021
The Tribunal condoned a 52-day delay in filing the appeal due to COVID-19 pandemic relaxations and directed the Registry to register the case as a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126028842021-24-03-2023
The Tribunal directed the respondent to explain why the Service Tax amount mentioned in the Property Manager's order dated 01.08.2019 has not yet been refunded to the appellant, despite the GST portion being returned.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Govind Kaushik
Respondent Advocate(s)
- N N Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal questioned the respondent's requirement for the appellant to approach the Head Office for a GST refund when the transaction was processed at the Moradabad branch, and directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions.
The Tribunal condoned a 52-day delay in filing the appeal due to COVID-19 pandemic relaxations and directed the Registry to register the case as a regular appeal.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to explain why the Service Tax amount mentioned in the Property Manager's order dated 01.08.2019 has not yet been refunded to the appellant, despite the GST portion being returned.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.