Appellant / Complainant
Ghaziabad Development Authority
Respondent
Sunil Dutt Upreti
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126028692022 by Ghaziabad Development Authority against Sunil Dutt Upreti before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment on behalf of the appellant and scheduled the case for orders on 30.04.2026.
Hearing
The appeal filed by Ghaziabad Development Authority was dismissed for non-prosecution, and the Tribunal directed that the amount deposited by the appellant-promoter be released to the respondent-allottee or remitted to U.P. RERA for disbursement.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 08.05.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 15.04.2025 because lawyers were abstaining from judicial work due to a resolution by the Real Estate Bar Association, Lucknow.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to condone a 396-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's COVID-19 pandemic relief mandate, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment on behalf of the appellant and rescheduled the hearing for 17.02.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of both parties and rescheduled the hearing for 28.01.2024.
Delay condonation
The appeal has been adjourned at the request of the appellant's counsel and is scheduled for a hearing on January 2, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for December 3, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 25.10.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that the settlement process failed and the matter had previously proceeded ex parte against the respondent; the case is adjourned to 23.09.2024 to allow the appellant's counsel to prepare the brief.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that no settlement was reached between the parties and adjourned the appeal for orders to 20.08.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 18.07.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 21.05.2024 to allow the parties to pursue an amicable settlement through ongoing negotiations.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent, Sunil Dutt Upreti, due to his failure to file objections despite previous opportunities and requests for adjournment. The matter is listed for an ex-parte hearing on 23.04.2024.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and scheduled the next hearing for 18.03.2024, noting that failure to file will result in ex-parte proceedings.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal by applying the Supreme Court's Suo-motu directions regarding the extension of limitation and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 29.09.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 02.08.2023 for orders/hearing due to the counsel for the appellant being on sanctioned leave.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, warning that the case will proceed ex-parte if they fail to comply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent deadline for the applicant to file a reply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the defective appeal for a hearing on 27.01.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent and directed the appellant to file an affidavit of service, listing the defective appeal for further orders on 19.12.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent and ordered the defective appeal to be listed on 23.11.2022 for further orders or hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for consideration of the condonation of delay application on 01.11.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent an additional 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for September 21, 2022.
Delay condonation
The proceeding is adjourned because the counsel for the appellant is on sanctioned leave, and the case is rescheduled for 23.08.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted the deposit of Rs. 1,98,193/- for compliance with Section 43(5) and directed the appellant to remove procedural defects and serve notice to the respondent by 04.08.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted a request to reschedule the hearing of Appeal-427/2022 and ordered the case to be listed on 07.07.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126028692022-17-02-2025
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to condone a 396-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's COVID-19 pandemic relief mandate, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126028692022-18-03-2024
The Tribunal has decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent, Sunil Dutt Upreti, due to his failure to file objections despite previous opportunities and requests for adjournment. The matter is listed for an ex-parte hearing on 23.04.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126028692022-08-01-2024
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal by applying the Supreme Court's Suo-motu directions regarding the extension of limitation and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126028692022-08-05-2025
The appeal filed by Ghaziabad Development Authority was dismissed for non-prosecution, and the Tribunal directed that the amount deposited by the appellant-promoter be released to the respondent-allottee or remitted to U.P. RERA for disbursement.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal filed by Ghaziabad Development Authority was dismissed for non-prosecution, and the Tribunal directed that the amount deposited by the appellant-promoter be released to the respondent-allottee or remitted to U.P. RERA for disbursement. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal filed by Ghaziabad Development Authority was dismissed for non-prosecution, and the Tribunal directed that the amount deposited by the appellant-promoter be released to the respondent-allottee or remitted to U.P. RERA for disbursement.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Arvind Kumar
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Respondent In-Person
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to condone a 396-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's COVID-19 pandemic relief mandate, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal has decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent, Sunil Dutt Upreti, due to his failure to file objections despite previous opportunities and requests for adjournment. The matter is listed for an ex-parte hearing on 23.04.2024.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal by applying the Supreme Court's Suo-motu directions regarding the extension of limitation and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The appeal filed by Ghaziabad Development Authority was dismissed for non-prosecution, and the Tribunal directed that the amount deposited by the appellant-promoter be released to the respondent-allottee or remitted to U.P. RERA for disbursement.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.