Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Ashish Srivastava, Priyanka Rai
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126028472021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Ashish Srivastava, Priyanka Rai before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of representation and no request for adjournment.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for further orders on February 3, 2023.
Hearing on Amendment Application
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the matter for hearing on January 2, 2023.
Hearing on Amendment Application
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for a hearing on December 1, 2022.
Hearing on Amendment Application
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on November 2, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and directed the parties to exchange pleadings before the next hearing scheduled for 26.09.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 02.09.2022 because the respondent was absent during the hearing.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed both parties to file and exchange written arguments within 20 days and scheduled the case for final hearing on August 3, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange lists of dates, events, and relied-upon case law before the next hearing, which is scheduled for 26.05.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for April 21, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic period and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalatnama within three days and ordered the filing of an objection against the limitation application within ten days, scheduling the matter for December 24, 2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the presence of counsel for the appellant and directed that the case be listed on 26.11.2021 after the appellant files an affidavit of service.
Delay condonation
The case is adjourned to 08.11.2021 due to the counsel for the appellant being on sanctioned leave, with a direction to file an affidavit of service.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act via deposit of Rs. 4,97,152/- and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to do so by the next hearing on 06.09.2021 may result in dismissal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to remove defects and comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to do so may result in dismissal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks' time to comply with the provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act and scheduled the defective appeal for a subsequent hearing on 12.08.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126028472021-14-03-2023
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of representation and no request for adjournment.
Tribunal Order #0901126028472021-06-09-2021
The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act via deposit of Rs. 4,97,152/- and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126028472021-24-12-2021
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic period and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of representation and no request for adjournment. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of representation and no request for adjournment.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Ibrahim Abbas
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of representation and no request for adjournment.
The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act via deposit of Rs. 4,97,152/- and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic period and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.