Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Sanjay Kumar Verma
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126028412021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Sanjay Kumar Verma before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its counsel.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections and adjourned the matter to 03.02.2023 due to the appellant's counsel's illness.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that the reply be shared with the respondent and uploaded to the e-portal before the next hearing on 02.01.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for a hearing on December 1, 2022.
Rest Arg. on Merit
The Tribunal granted an extension of one week to the respondent for filing objections to the grounds of appeal and directed both parties to exchange soft copies via email before the next hearing on 02.11.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant's counsel and directed both parties to exchange pleadings before the next hearing scheduled for 26.09.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a short extension to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for September 2, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the parties to file written arguments within 20 days and scheduled the case for final hearing on August 3, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply against the grounds of appeal and directed that a copy be emailed to the appellant's counsel. The case is scheduled for hearing on 26.05.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000 to be split between the Tribunal fund and the respondent, and directed the registry to register the appeal.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file an objection to the application for condonation of delay and serve a copy to the applicant's counsel via email before the next hearing.
Further Order
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent via registered post and email and scheduled the defective appeal for 24.12.2021 to address the limitation application.
Delay condonation
The court noted the presence of the appellant's counsel and directed that the case be listed on 26.11.2021 after the appellant files an affidavit of service.
Delay condonation
The case is adjourned to 08.11.2021 due to the counsel for the appellant being on sanctioned leave, with a direction to file an affidavit of service.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act via deposit of Rs. 3,60,959/- and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final one-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to do so by the next hearing on 06.09.2021 may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to remove defects and comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to do so by the next hearing on 26.08.2021 may result in dismissal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks' time to comply with the provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act and scheduled the defective appeal for a hearing on 12.08.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126028412021-04-03-2022
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000 to be split between the Tribunal fund and the respondent, and directed the registry to register the appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126028412021-14-03-2023
The appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its counsel.
Tribunal Order #0901126028412021-06-09-2021
The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act via deposit of Rs. 3,60,959/- and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its counsel. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its counsel.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shailendra Kumar Singh
- Deo Prakash Singh Chauhan
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000 to be split between the Tribunal fund and the respondent, and directed the registry to register the appeal.
The appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its counsel.
The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act via deposit of Rs. 3,60,959/- and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.