up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126028372025

Appellant / Complainant

Devidayal Aluminium Industries Private Limited

VS

Respondent

Dheeraj Arora, Parsvnath Buildwell Private Limited, Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Developer Firm

parsvnath buildwell private limited

Disputed Amount

50,29,276

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & Execution

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

13 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126028372025 by Devidayal Aluminium Industries Private Limited against Dheeraj Arora, Parsvnath Buildwell Private Limited, Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & Execution
2
Stage 115/04/2026

Defect Removal

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant cannot challenge a consequential recovery certificate without first challenging the underlying decree that established their liability as a co-promoter.

3
Stage 219/03/2026

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 a final 10-day extension to file objections, noting that the matter will proceed ex-parte against them if they fail to do so, and extended existing interim relief until the next hearing.

4
Stage 318/02/2026

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder and extended the existing interim order until the next hearing date on 19.03.2026.

5
Stage 419/01/2026

Defect Removal

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 18.02.2026 at the respondent's request, directed the respondent to file objections, and ordered that the existing interim order shall continue until the next hearing.

6
Stage 511/12/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted respondent No. 2 ten days to file objections and extended the existing interim order until the next hearing scheduled for 19.01.2026.

7
Stage 620/11/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal noted sufficient service upon the respondents and granted ten days for filing objections, with a direction to list the matter for orders on 11.12.2025.

8
Stage 730/10/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued fresh notice to the respondent due to non-service and directed the appellant to serve the notice, application for condonation of delay, and grounds of appeal via email and speed post before the next hearing on 20.11.2025.

9
Stage 823/09/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal allowed a waiver application following proof of payment of Rs. 19,43,300/- and ordered that the recovery amount against the appellant be kept in abeyance pending the appeal.

10
Stage 9Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126028372025-19-01-2026

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 18.02.2026 at the respondent's request, directed the respondent to file objections, and ordered that the existing interim order shall continue until the next hearing.

11
Stage 10Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126028372025-15-04-2026

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant cannot challenge a consequential recovery certificate without first challenging the underlying decree that established their liability as a co-promoter.

12
Stage 11Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126028372025-23-09-2025

The Tribunal allowed a waiver application following proof of payment of Rs. 19,43,300/- and ordered that the recovery amount against the appellant be kept in abeyance pending the appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant cannot challenge a consequential recovery certificate without first challenging the underlying decree that established their liability as a co-promoter. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 percent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentInterest Rate: MCLR+1 percentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant cannot challenge a consequential recovery certificate without first challenging the underlying decree that established their liability as a co-promoter.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1 percent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 40Section 63Section 64

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Puneet S Bisaria
  • Manu Lakhotiya

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Deeptanshu Jain

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126028372025-19-01-2026

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 18.02.2026 at the respondent's request, directed the respondent to file objections, and ordered that the existing interim order shall continue until the next hearing.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126028372025-15-04-2026

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant cannot challenge a consequential recovery certificate without first challenging the underlying decree that established their liability as a co-promoter.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126028372025-23-09-2025

The Tribunal allowed a waiver application following proof of payment of Rs. 19,43,300/- and ordered that the recovery amount against the appellant be kept in abeyance pending the appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for parsvnath buildwell private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →