up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126028192024

Appellant / Complainant

Adesh Kumar

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

20 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126028192024 by Adesh Kumar against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to complaints filed under the RERA Act 2016 and quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected allottees' claims on limitation grounds. It further held that promoters cannot evade their statutory obligation to pay delay interest by citing laches or the execution of a conveyance deed, especially when they fail to compute such interest in the final statement of accounts.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from various counsels representing the appellant and respondents, and subsequently reserved the judgment for further delivery.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Further Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 411/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the ongoing arguments in Appeal-234/2024 and scheduled the matter for further hearing on April 21, 2025.

6
Stage 509/04/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the appeal to be listed for orders/hearing on 11.04.2025 at 10.30 A.M.

7
Stage 608/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal refers the matter to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 220/2024 (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) for orders.

8
Stage 727/03/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of both parties, the matter has been adjourned and rescheduled for hearing on April 8, 2025, at 1:30 PM.

9
Stage 820/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal heard the parties and adjourned the appeal for further hearing, scheduled for March 27, 2025.

10
Stage 910/03/2025

Admission

The court has adjourned the appeal to March 20, 2025, for orders or hearing, following a request from the respondent's counsel.

11
Stage 1020/02/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 10.03.2025.

12
Stage 1128/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal noted the arguments regarding the applicability of the Limitation Act to RERA complaints and adjourned the matter to 20.02.2025 for further hearing.

13
Stage 1208/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the appellant ten days to file a rejoinder affidavit to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for orders on January 28, 2025.

14
Stage 1323/11/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the applicant to file a reply within one week of receiving said objections, scheduling the next hearing for 08.01.2025.

15
Stage 1428/10/2024

Admission

No text available.

16
Stage 1519/09/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent seven days to file objections and directed the applicant to file a reply within one week of receiving said objections, with the matter listed for orders on 28.10.2024.

17
Stage 1616/08/2024

Admission

No text available.

18
Stage 1719/07/2024

Admission

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appeal against the Regulatory Authority's order and established a procedural timeline for service of notice and filing of objections.

19
Stage 18Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126028192024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to complaints filed under the RERA Act 2016 and quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected allottees' claims on limitation grounds. It further held that promoters cannot evade their statutory obligation to pay delay interest by citing laches or the execution of a conveyance deed, especially when they fail to compute such interest in the final statement of accounts.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to complaints filed under the RERA Act 2016 and quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected allottees' claims on limitation grounds. It further held that promoters cannot evade their statutory obligation to pay delay interest by citing laches or the execution of a conveyance deed, especially when they fail to compute such interest in the final statement of accounts. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to complaints filed under the RERA Act 2016 and quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected allottees' claims on limitation grounds. It further held that promoters cannot evade their statutory obligation to pay delay interest by citing laches or the execution of a conveyance deed, especially when they fail to compute such interest in the final statement of accounts.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Misra
  • Gautam Johari

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126028192024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to complaints filed under the RERA Act 2016 and quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected allottees' claims on limitation grounds. It further held that promoters cannot evade their statutory obligation to pay delay interest by citing laches or the execution of a conveyance deed, especially when they fail to compute such interest in the final statement of accounts.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →