Appellant / Complainant
Pratima Singh
Respondent
U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126028172024 by Pratima Singh against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has heard arguments from various counsels representing the appellant and respondents, and has reserved the judgment for further delivery.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the ongoing arguments in Appeal-255/2024 and scheduled the matter for further hearing on April 21, 2025.
Further Hearing
Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the appeal has been adjourned and listed for orders/hearing on 11.04.2025 at 10.30 A.M.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal directs the parties to refer to the order passed in Appeal No. D 220/2024 (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) for the relevant orders.
Further Hearing
Upon the joint request of both parties, the matter has been adjourned and rescheduled for hearing on April 8, 2025, at 1:30 PM.
Admission
The Tribunal heard arguments from the counsel for the appellant and amicus curiae, and subsequently adjourned the appeal for further hearing on March 27, 2025.
Admission
The Tribunal has granted a request from the respondent's counsel to adjourn the matter, rescheduling the appeal for orders/hearing on March 20, 2025.
Admission
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 10.03.2025.
Admission
The Tribunal recorded the arguments regarding the applicability of the Limitation Act to the RERA Act and adjourned the matter to 20.02.2025 for hearing alongside similar appeals.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder affidavit to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for January 28, 2025.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the next hearing to be held on 08.01.2025.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file a vakalatnama and objections, with a directive for the appellant to file a rejoinder within 7 days of receiving the objections. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 28.10.2024.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file an affidavit of service along with proof of service via post and email, and scheduled the next hearing for 20.09.2024.
Admission
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the appeal via speed-post and email, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 14.08.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126028172024-29-08-2025
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Interest Period
from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
- Gautam Johari
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.