up_reraStatus: Active
CASE ID: 0901126027622022

Appellant / Complainant

Gorakhpur Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Jagdhatri Mishra

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / Interest

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

32 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027622022 by Gorakhpur Development Authority against Jagdhatri Mishra before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / Interest
2
Stage 121/02/2025

For Order

The Tribunal allowed an application to correct typographical errors regarding specific dates within the judgment and order dated 25.11.2024.

3
Stage 225/11/2024

Further Hearing

The Tribunal ruled that delay interest for the 'Lohia Enclave Phase-1 Yojna' project must be computed from the initially declared completion date of 13.04.2017, while excluding the period of the NGT injunction (17.12.2018 to 12.01.2021) as a force majeure event.

4
Stage 316/10/2024

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and scheduled the case for orders on 25.11.2024.

5
Stage 404/10/2024

For Order

The Tribunal has heard partial arguments from both parties and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on October 16, 2024.

6
Stage 504/09/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a bereavement in her family and rescheduled the hearing for 04.10.2024.

7
Stage 602/08/2024

For Order

No text available.

8
Stage 708/07/2024

For Order

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the appeal has been adjourned and listed for orders/hearing on 02.08.2024.

9
Stage 809/05/2024

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 08.07.2024 because the counsel for the appellant reported being ill.

10
Stage 908/04/2024

For Order

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on May 9, 2024.

11
Stage 1018/03/2024

For Order

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing several defective appeals (including Appeal No. D475/2022) based on the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2020 and directed the Registry to convert them into regular appeals.

12
Stage 1129/02/2024

For Order

The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel due to sanctioned leave and ordered the defective appeal to be listed for orders on 18.03.2024.

13
Stage 1224/01/2024

For Order

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled it for a new hearing date on 29.02.2024.

14
Stage 1317/01/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request from the counsels to reschedule a group of cases involving common issues and fixed the next hearing date for January 24, 2024.

15
Stage 1413/10/2023

For Order

No text available.

16
Stage 1505/09/2023

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a three-day strike called by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 13.10.2023.

17
Stage 1624/07/2023

For Order

No text available.

18
Stage 1711/05/2023

For Order

No text available.

19
Stage 1831/03/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file replies to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on May 11, 2023.

20
Stage 1920/02/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that a soft copy be emailed to the respondent's counsel, scheduling the matter for March 31, 2023.

21
Stage 2018/01/2023

For Order

No text available.

22
Stage 2113/12/2022

For Order

No text available.

23
Stage 2217/11/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the appellant to provide a hard copy of the appeal record to the respondent within 48 hours and established a timeline for filing objections and replies regarding the application for condonation of delay.

24
Stage 2321/10/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 17.11.2022.

25
Stage 2419/09/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for 21.10.2022.

26
Stage 2513/09/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal noted the appellant's absence and granted a request to list this defective appeal before Bench No. 1 alongside related cases; the matter is adjourned to 19.09.2022.

27
Stage 2622/08/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the case scheduled for hearing on 19.09.2022.

28
Stage 2721/07/2022

Defect Removal

No text available.

29
Stage 2827/05/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the respondent 15 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for July 21, 2022.

30
Stage 29Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126027622022-25-11-2024

The Tribunal ruled that delay interest for the 'Lohia Enclave Phase-1 Yojna' project must be computed from the initially declared completion date of 13.04.2017, while excluding the period of the NGT injunction (17.12.2018 to 12.01.2021) as a force majeure event.

31
Stage 30Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126027622022-18-03-2024

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing several defective appeals (including Appeal No. D475/2022) based on the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2020 and directed the Registry to convert them into regular appeals.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal ruled that delay interest for the 'Lohia Enclave Phase-1 Yojna' project must be computed from the initially declared completion date of 13.04.2017, while excluding the period of the NGT injunction (17.12.2018 to 12.01.2021) as a force majeure event. Awarded in favor of Partial.

Disposal Winner: PartialStatus: Active

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal ruled that delay interest for the 'Lohia Enclave Phase-1 Yojna' project must be computed from the initially declared completion date of 13.04.2017, while excluding the period of the NGT injunction (17.12.2018 to 12.01.2021) as a force majeure event.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Interest Period

from 30.04.2017 till handing over possession, excluding the period of injunction granted by the NGT from 17.12.2018 to 12.01.2021

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Rakesh Bajpai

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Abhishek Khare
  • Aahuti Agarwal

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126027622022-25-11-2024

The Tribunal ruled that delay interest for the 'Lohia Enclave Phase-1 Yojna' project must be computed from the initially declared completion date of 13.04.2017, while excluding the period of the NGT injunction (17.12.2018 to 12.01.2021) as a force majeure event.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126027622022-18-03-2024

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing several defective appeals (including Appeal No. D475/2022) based on the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2020 and directed the Registry to convert them into regular appeals.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →