up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126027402023

Appellant / Complainant

Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.

VS

Respondent

Rakesh Sood

Developer Firm

uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

18 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027402023 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Rakesh Sood before up_rera.

2
Stage 102/12/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 183-day delay in filing was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation.

3
Stage 201/10/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal and has reserved its judgment.

4
Stage 306/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to his absence from the station and scheduled the case for orders on 01.10.2024.

5
Stage 405/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to provide a copy of the rejoinder to the respondent within three days and scheduled the matter for hearing on 06.09.2024.

6
Stage 505/07/2024

Hearing

No text available.

7
Stage 608/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for July 5, 2024.

8
Stage 702/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and listed the defective appeal for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 08.05.2024.

9
Stage 801/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of a condonation of delay application on 02.05.2024.

10
Stage 927/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for hearing on 01.04.2024 regarding the application for condonation of delay.

11
Stage 1017/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a 10-day extension for the appellant to file a reply and rescheduled the hearing for February 27, 2024, due to the unavailability of counsel.

12
Stage 1113/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

13
Stage 1205/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 13.10.2023 due to a three-day strike called by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh.

14
Stage 1313/07/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent following the appellant's deposit of Rs. 7,88,629/- in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and directed specific procedures for service of notice and filing of objections regarding the application for condonation of delay.

15
Stage 1410/07/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

16
Stage 15Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126027402023-02-12-2024

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 183-day delay in filing was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation.

17
Stage 16Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126027402023-13-07-2023

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent following the appellant's deposit of Rs. 7,88,629/- in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and directed specific procedures for service of notice and filing of objections regarding the application for condonation of delay.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 183-day delay in filing was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 183-day delay in filing was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Bal Kishor Verma
  • Amit Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Sumit Sharma

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126027402023-02-12-2024

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 183-day delay in filing was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126027402023-13-07-2023

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent following the appellant's deposit of Rs. 7,88,629/- in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and directed specific procedures for service of notice and filing of objections regarding the application for condonation of delay.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →