Appellant / Complainant
Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Sushil Kumar
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027352023 by Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority against Sushil Kumar before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that administrative lethargy and bureaucratic procedures do not constitute 'sufficient cause' for delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment made by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the case for orders on 09.02.2026.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a rejoinder and scheduled the next hearing for January 28, 2026.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange pleadings and scheduled the case for orders on December 18, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for November 26, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file a rejoinder affidavit and scheduled the next hearing for November 6, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal scheduled the case for hearing on 10.10.2025 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for orders on 15.09.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and directed the applicant to serve the notice and appeal documents via post and email.
Tribunal Order #0901126027352023-09-02-2026
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that administrative lethargy and bureaucratic procedures do not constitute 'sufficient cause' for delay.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that administrative lethargy and bureaucratic procedures do not constitute 'sufficient cause' for delay. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that administrative lethargy and bureaucratic procedures do not constitute 'sufficient cause' for delay.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Prashant Kumar Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that administrative lethargy and bureaucratic procedures do not constitute 'sufficient cause' for delay.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.