up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126027342024

Appellant / Complainant

Bhoop Singh Sonal

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

20 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027342024 by Bhoop Singh Sonal against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The court has heard the arguments from the counsels for the appellant and respondents and has reserved the judgment for a later date.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Further Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 411/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on April 21, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.

6
Stage 509/04/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the appeal has been adjourned and listed for orders/hearing on 11.04.2025 at 10.30 A.M.

7
Stage 608/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal issued a procedural order directing the parties to refer to the order passed in Appeal No. D 220/2024 (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) for the relevant directions.

8
Stage 727/03/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of both parties, the matter has been adjourned and rescheduled for hearing on April 8, 2025, at 1:30 PM.

9
Stage 820/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal heard arguments from the appellant and amicus curiae and adjourned the appeal for further hearing on March 27, 2025.

10
Stage 910/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 20.03.2025 for orders/hearing upon the request of the respondent's counsel.

11
Stage 1020/02/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for March 10, 2025.

12
Stage 1128/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal noted the arguments regarding the applicability of the Limitation Act to RERA complaints and adjourned the matter to 20.02.2025 for further hearing alongside similar appeals.

13
Stage 1208/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week of receiving said objections, with the matter listed for orders on 28.01.2025.

14
Stage 1323/11/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the applicant to file a reply within one week of receiving said objections, scheduling the next hearing for 08.01.2025.

15
Stage 1428/10/2024

Admission

No text available.

16
Stage 1519/09/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 7 days to file objections, after which the applicant may file a reply within one week. The matter is listed for orders on 28.10.2024.

17
Stage 1616/08/2024

Admission

No text available.

18
Stage 1722/07/2024

Admission

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appeal and established a procedural timeline for service of notice, filing of objections, and subsequent replies.

19
Stage 18Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126027342024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Misra
  • Gautam Johari

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126027342024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →