Appellant / Complainant
Ambuj Shukla
Respondent
Jindal Promoters Pvt Ltd
jindal promoters pvt ltd
₹51,33,312
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027252022 by Ambuj Shukla against Jindal Promoters Pvt Ltd before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ambuj Shukla against the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that there was no delay in possession as the offer was made within the timeframe specified in the Builder Buyer Agreement.
Hearing
The appellant is challenging the Regulatory Authority's rejection of their claim for a refund due to delayed possession; however, the court has reserved its judgment following arguments from both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent's counsel and ordered the appeal to be listed for hearing/orders on 27.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to both parties to upload scanned copies of the Builder Buyer Agreement (BBA) and scheduled the next hearing for 27.07.2023, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's request to bring a scanned copy of the original Builder Buyer Agreement (BBA) on record and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 07.04.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, excusing a 40-day delay in filing the appeal based on the Supreme Court's extension of limitation periods, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and ordered the case to be listed for a subsequent hearing on 15.09.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for hearing on 30.08.2022 regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to register on the e-portal and scheduled the matter for August 8, 2022, to consider an application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the applicant's application for condonation of delay and directed specific procedural steps for service of notice and filing of objections.
Tribunal Order #0901126027252022-15-12-2022
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, excusing a 40-day delay in filing the appeal based on the Supreme Court's extension of limitation periods, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126027252022-07-05-2024
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ambuj Shukla against the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that there was no delay in possession as the offer was made within the timeframe specified in the Builder Buyer Agreement.
Tribunal Order #0901126027252022-25-01-2024
The appellant is challenging the Regulatory Authority's rejection of their claim for a refund due to delayed possession; however, the court has reserved its judgment following arguments from both parties.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ambuj Shukla against the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that there was no delay in possession as the offer was made within the timeframe specified in the Builder Buyer Agreement. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ambuj Shukla against the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that there was no delay in possession as the offer was made within the timeframe specified in the Builder Buyer Agreement.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Tushar Bahadur
- Sachin Gupta
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Mahendra Singh Sharma
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, excusing a 40-day delay in filing the appeal based on the Supreme Court's extension of limitation periods, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal.
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ambuj Shukla against the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that there was no delay in possession as the offer was made within the timeframe specified in the Builder Buyer Agreement.
The appellant is challenging the Regulatory Authority's rejection of their claim for a refund due to delayed possession; however, the court has reserved its judgment following arguments from both parties.
Need to research all rulings for jindal promoters pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.