Appellant / Complainant
Excella Premioinfra LLP
Respondent
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Prophome Solutions
excella premioinfra llp
₹2,00,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027232024 by Excella Premioinfra LLP against Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Prophome Solutions before up_rera.
Hearing
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the promoter, upholding a Rs. 2 lakh penalty for failing to include the project's RERA registration number and official website in a social media advertisement, ruling that the promoter remains liable for such omissions regardless of whether the advertisement was published by an authorized agent or an unauthorized third party.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to list the appeal for orders on 14.07.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request to list the defective appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay on 16.05.2025.
Delay condonation
Upon joint request from both parties, the Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay and for a hearing on April 22, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment on behalf of the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 24.03.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the hearing for 20.02.2025, to be heard alongside several related appeals.
Delay condonation
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the Tribunal has scheduled the case for a final hearing on February 5, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for hearing on January 3, 2025, and directed both parties to complete their pleadings in the interim.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 05.12.2024 due to advocates abstaining from judicial work following a Bar Council resolution.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent seven days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the appeal, with a subsequent week allowed for the appellant to file a reply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week after receiving the soft copy, scheduling the next hearing for 24.09.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appeal against a penalty of Rs. 2,00,000/- and set a returnable date of 22.08.2024, outlining the procedural requirements for service of notice and filing of objections.
Tribunal Order #0901126027232024-14-07-2025
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the promoter, upholding a Rs. 2 lakh penalty for failing to include the project's RERA registration number and official website in a social media advertisement, ruling that the promoter remains liable for such omissions regardless of whether the advertisement was published by an authorized agent or an unauthorized third party.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the promoter, upholding a Rs. 2 lakh penalty for failing to include the project's RERA registration number and official website in a social media advertisement, ruling that the promoter remains liable for such omissions regardless of whether the advertisement was published by an authorized agent or an unauthorized third party. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the promoter, upholding a Rs. 2 lakh penalty for failing to include the project's RERA registration number and official website in a social media advertisement, ruling that the promoter remains liable for such omissions regardless of whether the advertisement was published by an authorized agent or an unauthorized third party.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Deepak Agarwal
- Rajat Bhatia
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shireesh Kumar
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the promoter, upholding a Rs. 2 lakh penalty for failing to include the project's RERA registration number and official website in a social media advertisement, ruling that the promoter remains liable for such omissions regardless of whether the advertisement was published by an authorized agent or an unauthorized third party.
Need to research all rulings for excella premioinfra llp?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.