up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126027222024

Appellant / Complainant

Krishna Chandra Mishra

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

20 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027222024 by Krishna Chandra Mishra against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from various counsels representing the appellant and respondents, and subsequently reserved the judgment for future pronouncement.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Further Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 411/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for further hearing on April 21, 2025, as arguments are currently ongoing.

6
Stage 509/04/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal for orders/hearing to 11.04.2025 at 10.30 A.M.

7
Stage 608/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal issued a procedural order referring the matter to the orders passed in a related appeal (Appeal No. D 220/2024, Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad).

8
Stage 727/03/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the next hearing for April 8, 2025, at 1:30 PM.

9
Stage 820/03/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from the appellant's counsel, the amicus curiae, and the regulatory authority, and subsequently scheduled the appeal for further hearing on March 27, 2025.

10
Stage 910/03/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 20.03.2025 for orders/hearing upon the request of the respondent's counsel.

11
Stage 1020/02/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 10.03.2025.

12
Stage 1128/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal noted the arguments regarding the applicability of the Limitation Act to RERA complaints and adjourned the matter for hearing on 20.02.2025.

13
Stage 1208/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week of receiving said objections. The matter is listed for orders on 28.01.2025.

14
Stage 1323/11/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the applicant to file a reply within one week after receiving said objections, scheduling the next hearing for 08.01.2025.

15
Stage 1428/10/2024

Admission

No text available.

16
Stage 1519/09/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent seven days to file objections and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week of receiving said objections, with the matter listed for orders on 28.10.2024.

17
Stage 1616/08/2024

Admission

No text available.

18
Stage 1718/07/2024

Admission

The Tribunal admitted the appeal, directed the issuance of notice to the respondent, and established a procedural timeline for filing objections and replies before the next hearing on 16.08.2024.

19
Stage 18Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126027222024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Misra
  • Gautam Johri

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126027222024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →