Appellant / Complainant
Siddharth Mishra
Respondent
U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027212024 by Siddharth Mishra against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has heard the arguments from the counsels for all parties and has reserved the judgment for further delivery.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on April 21, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 11.04.2025 at 10:30 A.M. for orders/hearing following a joint request from the counsels of both parties.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal refers the matter to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 220/2024 (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) for directions.
Further Hearing
Upon the joint request of both parties, the matter has been adjourned and rescheduled for hearing on 08.04.2025 at 1:30 PM.
Admission
The Tribunal heard arguments from the counsel for the appellant, amicus curiae, and the Regulatory Authority, and subsequently scheduled the appeal for further hearing on March 27, 2025.
Admission
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 20.03.2025 for orders/hearing upon the request of the respondent's counsel.
Admission
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for March 10, 2025.
Admission
The Tribunal noted the arguments regarding the applicability of the Limitation Act to RERA complaints and adjourned the matter to 20.02.2025 for further hearing alongside similar appeals.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed them to email a copy to the appellant, with the matter listed for orders on 28.01.2025.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the applicant to file a reply within one week of receiving said objections, with the next hearing scheduled for 08.01.2025.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the respondent 7 days to file objections and directed the applicant to file a reply within one week of receiving them, with the matter listed for orders on 28.10.2024.
Admission
The Tribunal noted that the appeal is within the limitation period and directed the issuance of notice to the respondent, with instructions for service of process and filing of objections.
Tribunal Order #0901126027212024-29-08-2025
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Interest Period
from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
- Gautam Johari
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.