up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126027212022

Appellant / Complainant

Gorakhpur Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Jagdhatri Mishra

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Jurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

7 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027212022 by Gorakhpur Development Authority against Jagdhatri Mishra before up_rera.

Jurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 121/07/2022

For Order

The court noted that the appeal was wrongly listed for hearing because a previously registered appeal (No. 285/2022) had already been dismissed as not maintainable.

3
Stage 215/07/2022

For Order

The Tribunal dismissed Appeal No. 437/2022 as not maintainable because a prior appeal (No. 285/2022) had already been filed against the same order, and directed the Registry to transfer the deposited fees and statutory amounts totaling Rs. 4,89,404/- to the original appeal.

4
Stage 311/07/2022

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to reschedule the hearing of the defective appeal to 15.07.2022.

5
Stage 407/07/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal directed the Registry to submit a status report regarding Defective Appeal No. 285/2022 within 48 hours and scheduled the matter for further hearing on 11.07.2022.

6
Stage 5Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126027212022-15-07-2022

The Tribunal dismissed Appeal No. 437/2022 as not maintainable because a prior appeal (No. 285/2022) had already been filed against the same order, and directed the Registry to transfer the deposited fees and statutory amounts totaling Rs. 4,89,404/- to the original appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed Appeal No. 437/2022 as not maintainable because a prior appeal (No. 285/2022) had already been filed against the same order, and directed the Registry to transfer the deposited fees and statutory amounts totaling Rs. 4,89,404/- to the original appeal. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed Appeal No. 437/2022 as not maintainable because a prior appeal (No. 285/2022) had already been filed against the same order, and directed the Registry to transfer the deposited fees and statutory amounts totaling Rs. 4,89,404/- to the original appeal.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Rakesh Bajpai

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126027212022-15-07-2022

The Tribunal dismissed Appeal No. 437/2022 as not maintainable because a prior appeal (No. 285/2022) had already been filed against the same order, and directed the Registry to transfer the deposited fees and statutory amounts totaling Rs. 4,89,404/- to the original appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →