up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126027202024

Appellant / Complainant

Puja Singh

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

20 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027202024 by Puja Singh against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has heard arguments from various counsels representing the appellant and respondents, and has reserved the judgment for further consideration.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Further Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 411/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on April 21, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.

6
Stage 509/04/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the appeal has been rescheduled for orders/hearing on 11.04.2025 at 10.30 A.M.

7
Stage 608/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal refers the matter to the orders passed in Appeal No. D 220/2024 (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) for further directions.

8
Stage 727/03/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of both parties, the matter has been adjourned and rescheduled for hearing on April 8, 2025, at 1:30 PM.

9
Stage 820/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal for further hearing and scheduled the next proceeding for March 27, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.

10
Stage 910/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 20.03.2025 for orders/hearing upon the request of the respondent's counsel.

11
Stage 1020/02/2025

Admission

The appeal was adjourned to 10.03.2025 following a request for adjournment by the respondent's counsel due to illness.

12
Stage 1128/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal recorded arguments regarding the applicability of the Limitation Act to the RERA Act and listed the appeal for hearing on 20.02.2025.

13
Stage 1208/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel 10 days to file a rejoinder affidavit to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for orders on 28.01.2025.

14
Stage 1323/11/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the next hearing to be held on 08.01.2025.

15
Stage 1428/10/2024

Admission

No text available.

16
Stage 1519/09/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent seven days to file objections, after which the applicant has one week to file a reply; the matter is listed for orders on 28.10.2024.

17
Stage 1616/08/2024

Admission

No text available.

18
Stage 1718/07/2024

Admission

The Tribunal noted that the appeal is within the limitation period and directed the issuance of notice to the respondent for the next hearing scheduled on 16.08.2024.

19
Stage 18Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126027202024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Misra
  • Gautam Johri

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126027202024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →