up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126027152024

Appellant / Complainant

Neelam Shukla

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

20 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027152024 by Neelam Shukla against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and quashed orders rejecting complaints on limitation grounds, directing the Regulatory Authority to decide the restored complaints on merits while holding that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations through contracts or pleas of delay.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The court has heard the arguments from the counsels for all parties and has reserved the judgment for further delivery.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Further Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 411/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the ongoing arguments in Appeal-227/2024 and scheduled the matter for further hearing on April 21, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.

6
Stage 509/04/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the appeal to be listed for orders/hearing on 11.04.2025 at 10.30 A.M.

7
Stage 608/04/2025

Further Hearing

This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previously passed order dated 08.04.2025 in a related appeal (Appeal No. D 220/2024).

8
Stage 727/03/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the next hearing for April 8, 2025, at 1:30 PM.

9
Stage 820/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal heard arguments from the appellant's counsel and amicus curiae and adjourned the appeal for further hearing on March 27, 2025.

10
Stage 910/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 20.03.2025 for orders/hearing upon the request of the respondent's counsel.

11
Stage 1020/02/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for March 10, 2025.

12
Stage 1128/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal noted the arguments regarding the applicability of the Limitation Act to the RERA Act and adjourned the matter for hearing on 20.02.2025.

13
Stage 1208/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder affidavit to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for orders on 28.01.2025.

14
Stage 1323/11/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the next hearing to be held on 08.01.2025.

15
Stage 1428/10/2024

Admission

No text available.

16
Stage 1519/09/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 7 days to file objections and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week of receiving them, scheduling the next hearing for 28.10.2024.

17
Stage 1616/08/2024

Admission

No text available.

18
Stage 1718/07/2024

Admission

The Tribunal noted the appeal is within limitation and directed the issuance of notice to the respondent, setting a timeline for filing objections and replies before the next hearing on 16.08.2024.

19
Stage 18Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126027152024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and quashed orders rejecting complaints on limitation grounds, directing the Regulatory Authority to decide the restored complaints on merits while holding that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations through contracts or pleas of delay.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and quashed orders rejecting complaints on limitation grounds, directing the Regulatory Authority to decide the restored complaints on merits while holding that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations through contracts or pleas of delay. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and quashed orders rejecting complaints on limitation grounds, directing the Regulatory Authority to decide the restored complaints on merits while holding that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations through contracts or pleas of delay.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Misra
  • Gautam Johri

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126027152024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal ruled that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and quashed orders rejecting complaints on limitation grounds, directing the Regulatory Authority to decide the restored complaints on merits while holding that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations through contracts or pleas of delay.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →