Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Ashish Kumar Srivastava
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027102022 by Lucknow Development Authority against Ashish Kumar Srivastava before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution because its panel lawyers were disengaged and no authorized representative appeared to request an adjournment.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that a soft copy be emailed to the respondent.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant five days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for hearing on February 8, 2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that the reply be shared via email and uploaded to the e-portal.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the parties to exchange electronic copies and upload their filings to the e-portal before the next hearing on 07.12.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal by applying the Supreme Court's extension of limitation period and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file their Vakalatnama, objections to the delay condonation application, and a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing date.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file an objection against the delay condonation application and a reply to the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for 31.08.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and directed the applicant to rectify registry defects and serve notice via speed-post and email.
Tribunal Order #0901126027102022-21-04-2023
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution because its panel lawyers were disengaged and no authorized representative appeared to request an adjournment.
Tribunal Order #0901126027102022-30-09-2022
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal by applying the Supreme Court's extension of limitation period and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution because its panel lawyers were disengaged and no authorized representative appeared to request an adjournment. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution because its panel lawyers were disengaged and no authorized representative appeared to request an adjournment.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhinav Mani Tripathi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Samarth Saxena
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution because its panel lawyers were disengaged and no authorized representative appeared to request an adjournment.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal by applying the Supreme Court's extension of limitation period and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.