up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126027082024

Appellant / Complainant

Sunil Kumar Gandhi

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

20 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027082024 by Sunil Kumar Gandhi against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has heard the arguments from the counsels for the appellant and respondents and has reserved the judgment for further delivery.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Further Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 411/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the ongoing arguments in Appeal-222/2024 and scheduled the matter for further hearing on April 21, 2025.

6
Stage 509/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has granted a request from the counsel for both parties to adjourn the appeal and has rescheduled the hearing for April 11, 2025, at 10:30 a.m.

7
Stage 608/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal refers the matter to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 220/2024 (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) for directions.

8
Stage 727/03/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of both parties, the matter has been adjourned and rescheduled for hearing on April 8, 2025, at 1:30 PM.

9
Stage 820/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal for further hearing, scheduling the next session for March 27, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.

10
Stage 910/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 20.03.2025 for orders/hearing upon the request of the respondent's counsel.

11
Stage 1020/02/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on March 10, 2025.

12
Stage 1128/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal noted the arguments regarding the applicability of the Limitation Act to the RERA Act and adjourned the matter to 20.02.2025 for further hearing.

13
Stage 1208/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed that a copy be emailed to the appellant, with the appellant permitted to file a reply within one week thereafter.

14
Stage 1323/11/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the next hearing to be held on 08.01.2025.

15
Stage 1428/10/2024

Admission

No text available.

16
Stage 1519/09/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 7 days to file objections and allowed the applicant one week to file a reply thereafter, scheduling the next hearing for 28.10.2024.

17
Stage 1616/08/2024

Admission

No text available.

18
Stage 1718/07/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal noted the appeal is within limitation and directed the issuance of notice to the respondent, setting a timeline for service of process and the filing of objections/replies.

19
Stage 18Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126027082024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Misra
  • Gautam Johri

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126027082024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →